Chak Fu Lam
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Demography top 2%
- Co-authors
- Gretchen M. SpreitzerRyan W. QuinnCharlotte FritzDavid M. MayerSuzanne T. GurlandChristopher RoussinCynthia LeeJian Liang
- Topics
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (17 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers)Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesHong KongChina
In The Last Decade
Chak Fu Lam
28 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.2k
- Social Psychology 693
- Sociology and Political Science 525
- General Health Professions 258
- Demography 221
Countries citing papers authored by Chak Fu Lam
This map shows the geographic impact of Chak Fu Lam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chak Fu Lam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chak Fu Lam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chak Fu Lam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chak Fu Lam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chak Fu Lam. The network helps show where Chak Fu Lam may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chak Fu Lam
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chak Fu Lam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chak Fu Lam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chak Fu Lam. Chak Fu Lam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 38 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 62 | |
| 6 | 79 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 135 | |
| 10 | 124 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 141 | |
| 13 | 302 | |
| 14 | 186 | |
| 15 | 103 | |
| 16 | 53 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | Engagement and human thriving: Complementary perspectives on energy and connections to work | 59 |
| 19 | Understanding evolutionary theory: The role of epistemological development and beliefs | 3 |
| 20 | 110 |
About Chak Fu Lam
Chak Fu Lam is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (17 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.2k citations), Applied Psychology (190 citations) and Social Psychology (693 citations). Chak Fu Lam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and China. Frequent co-authors include Gretchen M. Spreitzer, Ryan W. Quinn, Charlotte Fritz, David M. Mayer, Suzanne T. Gurland, Christopher Roussin, Cynthia Lee, Jian Liang, Susan J. Ashford and Yulin Deng. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Review, Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.