Academy of Management Review

4.7k papers and 1.0M indexed citations i.

About

The 4.7k papers published in Academy of Management Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.0M indexed citations. Papers published in Academy of Management Review usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.3k papers), Strategy and Management (858 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (520 papers) specifically the topics of Management and Organizational Studies (798 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (448 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (306 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Academy of Management Review are Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, Mark C. Suchman, Geert Hofstede, Donald C. Hambrick, Sumantra Ghoshal, Blake E. Ashforth, Karl E. Weick, Rabi S. Bhagat, Christine Oliver and Archie B. Carroll.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Academy of Management Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Academy of Management Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Academy of Management Review.

Countries where authors publish in Academy of Management Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Academy of Management Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Academy of Management Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Academy of Management Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025