Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
PSYCHOLOGICAL, EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT AND VALIDATION.
Countries citing papers authored by Gretchen M. Spreitzer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Gretchen M. Spreitzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gretchen M. Spreitzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gretchen M. Spreitzer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gretchen M. Spreitzer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gretchen M. Spreitzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gretchen M. Spreitzer. The network helps show where Gretchen M. Spreitzer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gretchen M. Spreitzer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gretchen M. Spreitzer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gretchen M. Spreitzer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Gretchen M. Spreitzer. Gretchen M. Spreitzer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Barnes, Christopher M. & Gretchen M. Spreitzer. (2015). Why sleep is a strategic resource. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 56(2). 19–21.20 indexed citations
7.
Spreitzer, Gretchen M., Lyndon Earl Garrett, & Peter Bacevice. (2015). Should your company embrace coworking. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 57(1). 27–29.26 indexed citations
8.
Spreitzer, Gretchen M., Christine L. Porath, & Cristina B. Gibson. (2012). Toward human sustainability. Organizational Dynamics. 41(2). 155–162.316 indexed citations
9.
Porath, Christine L., et al.. (2011). Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 33(2). 250–275.718 indexed citations breakdown →
Mishra, Aneil K., Karen E. Mishra, & Gretchen M. Spreitzer. (2009). Downsizing the Company Without Downsizing Morale. MIT Sloan management review. 50(3). 39–44.24 indexed citations
13.
Spreitzer, Gretchen M., Mary Sue Colemán, & Daniel A. Gruber. (2007). Positive Strategic Leadership: Lessons from a University President. 155–170.2 indexed citations
14.
Lawrence, Katherine, Jane E. Dutton, & Gretchen M. Spreitzer. (2005). Putting it together...bit by bit: A relational theory of interpersonal collaboration in software development.. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).1 indexed citations
15.
Spreitzer, Gretchen M., Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, Jane E. Dutton, Scott Sonenshein, & Adam M. Grant. (2005). A Socially Embedded Model of Thriving at Work. Organization Science. 16(5). 537–549.1016 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Spreitzer, Gretchen M., et al.. (2005). Ponga el acento en sus fortalezas. Harvard business review. 83(1). 62–68.3 indexed citations
Cooke, William N., Aneil K. Mishra, Gretchen M. Spreitzer, & Mary Tschirhart. (1995). The Determinants of NLRB Decision-Making Revisited. Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 48(2). 237–257.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.