Elizabeth McClean

12 papers receiving 733 citations

Peers

Elizabeth McClean
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 477
  • Communication 68
  • Social Psychology 187
  • Gender Studies 86
  • Public Administration 32
Replace Beth S. Schinoff with:
Beth S. Schinoff United States
Vickie Coleman Gallagher United States
Patrick Tissington United Kingdom
Irene Hau Siu Chow Hong Kong
Sylvie Guerrero Canada
Ann Yan Zhang China
Charissa Freese Netherlands
Min Z. Carter United States
Natalya M. Parfyonova United States
Fred R. Blass United States
Elizabeth McClean relative to Beth S. Schinoff United States Beth S. Schinoff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Beth S. Schinoff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth McClean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth McClean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth McClean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth McClean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth McClean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth McClean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth McClean. The network helps show where Elizabeth McClean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elizabeth McClean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elizabeth McClean Line = papers co-authored together Elizabeth McClean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2011186
2 2017178
3 2012174
4 201889
5 202144
6 202142
7 202123
8
Measurement of human resource practices : Issues regarding scale, scope, source and substantive content
201313
9 20228
10 20236
11 20092
12 20201
13 20190

About Elizabeth McClean

Elizabeth McClean is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science and Applied Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 766 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (477 citations), Communication (68 citations), Social Psychology (187 citations), Gender Studies (86 citations) and Public Administration (32 citations). Elizabeth McClean has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Christopher J. Collins, Ethan R. Burris, James R. Detert, Sean Martín, Kyle J. Emich, Sarah Doyle, Todd Woodruff, Nathan P. Podsakoff, Michel Hermans and Susanne Beijer. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Human Resource Management, Journal of Business Ethics, Organization Science and Journal of Applied Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact