Demography

479.5k papers and 6.7M indexed citations i.

About

479.5k papers covering Demography have received a total of 6.7M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Family Dynamics and Relationships, SMEs Development and Digital Marketing and Retirement, Disability, and Employment and also cover the fields of Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics. Some of the most active scholars covering Demography are Paul R. Amato, Ernst Fehr, Daron Acemoğlu, James A. Robinson, Graham B. Spanier, Jay Belsky, Simon Johnson, Phillip R. Shaver, Matthijs Kalmijn and James W. Vaupel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Demography

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Demography. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Demography.

Countries where authors publish papers about Demography

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Demography. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Demography with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Demography more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025