Ume Roobab

3.2k total citations · 2 hit papers
44 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Ume Roobab is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Food Science and Animal Science and Zoology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ume Roobab has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Biotechnology, 23 papers in Food Science and 17 papers in Animal Science and Zoology. Recurrent topics in Ume Roobab's work include Microbial Inactivation Methods (27 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (17 papers) and Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (9 papers). Ume Roobab is often cited by papers focused on Microbial Inactivation Methods (27 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (17 papers) and Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (9 papers). Ume Roobab collaborates with scholars based in China, Pakistan and Malaysia. Ume Roobab's co-authors include Rana Muhammad Aadil, Rai Naveed Arshad, Alaa El‐Din A. Bekhit, Ghulam Muhammad Madni, Muhammad Faisal Manzoor, Muhammad Modassar Ali Nawaz Ranjha, Xin‐An Zeng, Zulkurnain Abdul‐Malek, Muhammad Imran Qureshi and Muhammad Asim Shabbir and has published in prestigious journals such as Carbohydrate Polymers, Trends in Food Science & Technology and Molecules.

In The Last Decade

Ume Roobab

44 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Pulsed electric field: A potential alternative towards a sustainable food processing

2021 204 citations Rai Naveed Arshad, Ume Roobab et al. Trends in Food Science & Technology profile →
A Critical Review on Pulsed Electric Field: A Novel Technology for the Extraction of Phytoconstituents

2021 178 citations Muhammad Modassar Ali Nawaz Ranjha, Rabia Kanwal et al. Molecules profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ume Roobab China	27	1.1k	848	437	425	370	44	2.3k
Silvia Tappi Italy	29	1.1k 1.0×	809 1.0×	457 1.0×	721 1.7×	388 1.0×	91	2.7k
Xin‐An Zeng China	27	1.0k 0.9×	552 0.7×	298 0.7×	391 0.9×	471 1.3×	116	2.2k
Iesel Van der Plancken Belgium	29	1.5k 1.4×	968 1.1×	592 1.4×	497 1.2×	465 1.3×	49	2.5k
Snehasis Chakraborty India	27	900 0.8×	951 1.1×	197 0.5×	685 1.6×	299 0.8×	114	2.1k
David R. Sepúlveda Mexico	25	1.1k 1.0×	518 0.6×	187 0.4×	537 1.3×	438 1.2×	70	2.2k
Cornelis Versteeg Australia	27	1.2k 1.1×	1.4k 1.7×	393 0.9×	831 2.0×	390 1.1×	50	2.7k
Dong‐Un Lee South Korea	20	759 0.7×	689 0.8×	241 0.6×	251 0.6×	280 0.8×	58	1.8k
Zoran Herceg Croatia	25	1.9k 1.7×	994 1.2×	654 1.5×	430 1.0×	500 1.4×	96	3.3k
Zhi‐Hong Zhang China	23	780 0.7×	486 0.6×	173 0.4×	375 0.9×	296 0.8×	44	1.7k
Giovana Domeneghini Mercali Brazil	24	773 0.7×	518 0.6×	185 0.4×	368 0.9×	317 0.9×	43	1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Ume Roobab

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ume Roobab's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ume Roobab with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ume Roobab more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ume Roobab

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ume Roobab. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ume Roobab. The network helps show where Ume Roobab may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ume Roobab

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ume Roobab. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ume Roobab based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ume Roobab. Ume Roobab is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Roobab, Ume, Rana Muhammad Aadil, Shyam S. Kurup, & Sajid Maqsood. (2025). Comparative evaluation of ultrasound-assisted extraction with other green extraction methods for sustainable recycling and processing of date palm bioresources and by-products: A review of recent research. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 114. 107252–107252. 9 indexed citations

Ali, Murtaza, et al.. (2024). Impact of sustainable emerging cold plasma technology on the optical properties of foods. Food Bioscience. 59. 104220–104220. 4 indexed citations

Khan, Abdul Waheed, et al.. (2024). Salt reduction in food products: A systematic review of clean-label ingredients and non-thermal technologies. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 153. 104695–104695. 21 indexed citations

Roobab, Ume, Bo-Ru Chen, Ghulam Muhammad Madni, et al.. (2024). Evaluation of ultrasound and pulsed electric field combinations on the cooking Losses, texture Profile, and Taste-Related amino acids of chicken breast meat. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 107. 106919–106919. 18 indexed citations

Roobab, Ume, Bo-Ru Chen, Ghulam Muhammad Madni, et al.. (2024). Enhancing chicken breast meat quality through ultrasonication: Physicochemical, palatability, and amino acid profiles. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 104. 106824–106824. 26 indexed citations

Chen, Bo-Ru, Ume Roobab, Ghulam Muhammad Madni, et al.. (2024). A review of emerging applications of ultrasonication in Comparison with non-ionizing technologies for meat decontamination. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 108. 106962–106962. 5 indexed citations

Roobab, Ume & Sajid Maqsood. (2023). Recent developments on utilising diverse plant seed flours as novel functional ingredients for noodle formulation and their impact on quality attributes. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 59(2). 1082–1093. 5 indexed citations

Roobab, Ume, Xin‐An Zeng, Waqar Ahmed, et al.. (2023). Effect of Pulsed Electric Field on the Chicken Meat Quality and Taste-Related Amino Acid Stability: Flavor Simulation. Foods. 12(4). 710–710. 19 indexed citations

Baba, Waqas N., et al.. (2023). Exploring the impact of various cooking techniques on the physicochemical and quality characteristics of camel meat product. Animal Bioscience. 36(11). 1747–1756. 8 indexed citations

10.

Roobab, Ume, James S. Chacha, Ghulam Muhammad Madni, et al.. (2022). Applications of Innovative Non-Thermal Pulsed Electric Field Technology in Developing Safer and Healthier Fruit Juices. Molecules. 27(13). 4031–4031. 57 indexed citations

11.

Al‐Hilphy, Asaad R., et al.. (2022). Effects of electrical field stimulation on the physicochemical and sensory attributes of aged chicken meat. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 45(5). 4 indexed citations

12.

Batool, Maria, Muhammad Modassar Ali Nawaz Ranjha, Ume Roobab, et al.. (2022). Nutritional Value, Phytochemical Potential, and Therapeutic Benefits of Pumpkin (Cucurbita sp.). Plants. 11(11). 1394–1394. 74 indexed citations

13.

Ranjha, Muhammad Modassar Ali Nawaz, Bakhtawar Shafique, Abdur Rehman, et al.. (2022). Biocompatible Nanomaterials in Food Science, Technology, and Nutrient Drug Delivery: Recent Developments and Applications. Frontiers in Nutrition. 8. 778155–778155. 68 indexed citations

14.

Mukhtar, Kinza, Brera Ghulam Nabi, Rai Naveed Arshad, et al.. (2022). Potential impact of ultrasound, pulsed electric field, high-pressure processing and microfludization against thermal treatments preservation regarding sugarcane juice (Saccharum officinarum). Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 90. 106194–106194. 57 indexed citations

15.

Roobab, Ume, et al.. (2021). Impact of high‐pressure treatments on enzyme activity of fruit‐based beverages: an overview. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 57(2). 801–815. 36 indexed citations

16.

Roobab, Ume, Muhammad Inam‐Ur‐Raheem, Abdul Waheed Khan, et al.. (2021). Innovations in High-pressure Technologies for the Development of Clean Label Dairy Products: A Review. Food Reviews International. 39(2). 970–991. 37 indexed citations

17.

Ranjha, Muhammad Modassar Ali Nawaz, Shafeeqa Irfan, José M. Lorenzo, et al.. (2021). Sonication, a Potential Technique for Extraction of Phytoconstituents: A Systematic Review. Processes. 9(8). 1406–1406. 114 indexed citations

18.

Roobab, Ume, et al.. (2021). High pressure‐based hurdle interventions for raw and processed meat: a clean‐label prospective. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 57(2). 816–826. 26 indexed citations

19.

Ranjha, Muhammad Modassar Ali Nawaz, Rabia Kanwal, Bakhtawar Shafique, et al.. (2021). A Critical Review on Pulsed Electric Field: A Novel Technology for the Extraction of Phytoconstituents. Molecules. 26(16). 4893–4893. 178 indexed citations breakdown →

20.

Roobab, Ume, Abdul Waheed Khan, José M. Lorenzo, et al.. (2021). A systematic review of clean-label alternatives to synthetic additives in raw and processed meat with a special emphasis on high-pressure processing (2018–2021). Food Research International. 150(Pt A). 110792–110792. 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact