Nathan H. Clemens

1.3k citations
48 papers · 791 indexed · h-index 16

Nathan H. Clemens

44 papers receiving 739 citations

Peers

Nathan H. Clemens
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 627
  • Statistics and Probability 229
  • Education 378
  • Safety Research 65
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 109
Replace Eunsoo Cho with:
Eunsoo Cho United States
Stephen Ciullo United States
Jeremy Miciak United States
Jill H. Allor United States
Tammy D. Tolar United States
Philip Capin United States
Meaghan Edmonds United States
Jan Hasbrouck United States
Leslie E. Simmons United States
Colleen K. Reutebuch United States
Nathan H. Clemens relative to Eunsoo Cho United States Eunsoo Cho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Eunsoo Cho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan H. Clemens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan H. Clemens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan H. Clemens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan H. Clemens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan H. Clemens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan H. Clemens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan H. Clemens. The network helps show where Nathan H. Clemens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan H. Clemens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan H. Clemens Line = papers co-authored together Nathan H. Clemens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20240
3 20248
4 20241
5 20233
6 20234
7 20222
8 20223
9 20214
10 202116
11 202125
12 202012
13 201938
14 20183
15
Presenters in Focus: Updating Your Toolkit for Monitoring Progress of Younger Struggling Readers--Q&A with Nathan Clemens.
20172
16 20174
17 20177
18 20165
19 201516
20 201432

About Nathan H. Clemens

Nathan H. Clemens is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Education, having authored 48 papers that have together received 791 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (40 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (21 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (8 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (8 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (6 papers), Language Development and Disorders (6 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (5 papers) and Writing and Handwriting Education (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (627 citations), Statistics and Probability (229 citations) and Education (378 citations). Nathan H. Clemens has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Lee Kern, Leslie E. Simmons, Deborah C. Simmons, Eric L. Oslund, Edward S. Shapiro, John L. Davis, Oi‐Man Kwok, Felix Thoemmes, Sharon Vaughn and Douglas Fuchs. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Educational Psychology Review and Reading Research Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026