Safety Research

486.9k papers and 8.4M indexed citations

About

486.9k papers covering Safety Research have received a total of 8.4M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare, Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies and Youth Development and Social Support and also cover the fields of Sociology and Political Science, Education and Economics and Econometrics. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Sociology and Political Science, Education and Clinical Psychology. Some of the most active scholars covering Safety Research are Icek Ajzen, Richard M. Ryan, Edward L. Deci, Ernst Fehr, Albert Bandura, John Bowlby, Urs Fischbacher, Jacquelynne S. Eccles, Colin F. Camerer and Элинор Остром.

In The Last Decade

Safety Research

81.6k papers receiving 684.0k citations

Countries where authors publish papers about Safety Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Safety Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Safety Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Safety Research more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers about Safety Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Safety Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Safety Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026