Educational Psychology Review

1.3k papers and 93.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Educational Psychology Review in the last decades have received a total of 93.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Educational Psychology Review usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (659 papers), Education (523 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (452 papers) specifically the topics of Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (308 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (238 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (179 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Educational Psychology Review are John Sweller, Reinhard Pekrun, Fred Paas, Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer, Cindy E. Hmelo‐Silver, Paul R. Pintrich, Slava Kalyuga, Richard E. Mayer, Allan Wigfield and Gregory Schraw.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Educational Psychology Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Educational Psychology Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Educational Psychology Review.

Countries where authors publish in Educational Psychology Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Educational Psychology Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Educational Psychology Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Educational Psychology Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025