Reading Research Quarterly

1.6k papers and 81.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Reading Research Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 81.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Reading Research Quarterly usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (999 papers), Education (738 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (253 papers) specifically the topics of Reading and Literacy Development (873 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (221 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (169 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reading Research Quarterly are Keith E. Stanovich, Richard C. Anderson, William E. Nagy, Dolores Durkin, Susan B. Neuman, Kris D. Gutiérrez, Nell K. Duke, Linnea C. Ehri, Warwick B. Elley and John T. Guthrie.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Reading Research Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reading Research Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reading Research Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Reading Research Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reading Research Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reading Research Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reading Research Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025