Organization Science

2.3k papers and 383.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Organization Science in the last decades have received a total of 383.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Organization Science usually cover Strategy and Management (1.1k papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (750 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (527 papers) specifically the topics of Innovation and Knowledge Management (729 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (490 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (346 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Organization Science are James G. March, Ikujiro Nonaka, Wanda J. Orlikowski, Bruce Kogut, Udo Zander, George W. Huber, John Seely Brown, Paul R. Carlile, Robert M. Grant and Paul Duguid.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Organization Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Organization Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Organization Science.

Countries where authors publish in Organization Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Organization Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Organization Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Organization Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025