Journal of Business Ethics

9.6k papers and 520.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 9.6k papers published in Journal of Business Ethics in the last decades have received a total of 520.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Business Ethics usually cover Information Systems and Management (4.0k papers), Strategy and Management (2.9k papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (2.7k papers) specifically the topics of Ethics in Business and Education (4.0k papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (2.1k papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (1.3k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Business Ethics are Yu‐Shan Chen, Scott J. Vitell, Hoje Jo, Domènec Melé, Dima Jamali, Duygu Türker, Maretno A. Harjoto, Marcel van Marrewijk, Xingqiang Du and Ching‐Hsun Chang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Business Ethics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Business Ethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Business Ethics.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Business Ethics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Business Ethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Business Ethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Business Ethics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025