Human Resource Management

2.1k papers and 78.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Human Resource Management in the last decades have received a total of 78.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Human Resource Management usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.0k papers), Strategy and Management (366 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (309 papers) specifically the topics of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (563 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (260 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (194 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human Resource Management are Patrick M. Wright, Gunnar Hedlund, Arnold B. Bakker, Dave Ulrich, Jay B. Barney, Mahesh Subramony, Evangelia Demerouti, Willem Verbeke, Fang Lee Cooke and Anne‐Wil Harzing.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Human Resource Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Human Resource Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human Resource Management.

Countries where authors publish in Human Resource Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human Resource Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human Resource Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Resource Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025