Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Sandy Muspratt
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Sandy Muspratt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandy Muspratt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandy Muspratt more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandy Muspratt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandy Muspratt. The network helps show where Sandy Muspratt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandy Muspratt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandy Muspratt.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandy Muspratt based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sandy Muspratt. Sandy Muspratt is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Exley, Beryl, et al.. (2016). Surveying the field: Primary school teachers' perceptions of the literacy capabilities of recently graduated primary school teachers. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).1 indexed citations
5.
Gallagher, Tiffany L., Sheila Bennett, Deb Keen, & Sandy Muspratt. (2016). Examining Learner Engagement Strategies. Teacher Education and Special Education The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children. 40(1). 51–64.7 indexed citations
Evans, Terry, et al.. (2013). Using action research to improve the quality of teaching in basic education. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 57–62.
9.
Mills, Martin, Glenda McGregor, & Sandy Muspratt. (2012). Flexible learning options/centres in the ACT. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 39(6). 91–105.3 indexed citations
10.
Beavis, Catherine, et al.. (2012). The ACMA cybersmart outreach program evaluation: qualitative report. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University).2 indexed citations
Evans, Terry, et al.. (2010). Reflections on conducting educational research projects in Papua New Guinea. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 4(2). 72–89.6 indexed citations
Muspratt, Sandy & Peter Freebody. (2007). Students' perceptions of the characteristics of "good" and "poor" digital learning objects. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia).4 indexed citations
15.
Evans, Terry, et al.. (2007). PNG curriculum reform implementation project : impact study 6 final report. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University).1 indexed citations
16.
Muspratt, Sandy, et al.. (2001). Difference, silence, and textual practice : studies in critical literacy. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia).9 indexed citations
Bigum, Chris, Bill Green, Eileen Honan, et al.. (1997). Digital Rhetorics: Literacies and Technologies in Education - Current Practices and Future Directions (Volumes 1-3).31 indexed citations
19.
Nakata, Martin & Sandy Muspratt. (1994). How to read across the curriculum: The case of a Social Studies 'Social Investigation Strategy' as ideological practice. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy. 17(3). 227.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.