Wes Pearson

432 citations
14 papers · 347 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Fermentation and Sensory Analysis 13
    • Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods 3
    • Botanical Research and Applications 1
    • Horticultural and Viticultural Research 10
    • Organic Food and Agriculture 1

Wes Pearson

14 papers receiving 342 citations

Peers

Wes Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 64
  • Food Science 318
  • Biochemistry 103
  • Plant Science 213
  • Sensory Systems 26
Replace Alice Barker with:
Alice Barker Australia
Soline Caillé France
Marcela Medel‐Marabolí Chile
Ana Jiménez‐Cantizano Spain
Efimia Hatzidimitriou Greece
María Cristina Goldner Argentina
A. Gonzalo-Diago Spain
Frank Benkwitz New Zealand
Belinda Kemp Canada
Kate A. Lattey Australia
Wes Pearson relative to Alice Barker Australia Alice Barker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Alice Barker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wes Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wes Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wes Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wes Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wes Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wes Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wes Pearson. The network helps show where Wes Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wes Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wes Pearson Line = papers co-authored together Wes Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201496
2 201856
3 201931
4 201926
5 202019
6 202119
7 201618
8 202318
9 201717
10 201917
11 202015
12 20198
13 20216
14 20251

About Wes Pearson

Wes Pearson is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science, Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (13 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (10 papers), Wine Industry and Tourism (6 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (3 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (3 papers), Botanical Research and Applications (1 paper), Organic Food and Agriculture (1 paper) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (64 citations), Food Science (318 citations), Biochemistry (103 citations), Plant Science (213 citations) and Sensory Systems (26 citations). Wes Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include I. Leigh Francis, Helen E. Holt, David W. Jeffery, Christine Mayr Marangon, Alice Barker, John Blackman, Leigh M. Schmidtke, Philippe Darriet, Tracey Siebert and Miguel de Barros Lopes. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, Food Quality and Preference, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Journal of Marketing Management and American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact