American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
About
In The Last Decade
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
3.4k papers receiving 111.7k citations
Fields of papers published in American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
This network shows the impact of papers published in American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
Countries where authors publish in American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in American Journal of Enology and Viticulture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Journal of Enology and Viticulture more than expected).
- Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic-Phosphotungstic Acid Reagents (1965)
- Total Phenol Analysis: Automation and Comparison with Manual Methods (1977)
- Total Phenol Analysis: Automation and Comparison with Manual Methods (1977)
- The Copigmentation of Anthocyanins and Its Role in the Color of Red Wine: A Critical Review (2001)
- Environmental and Management Practices Affecting Grape Composition and Wine Quality - A Review (1993)
- Concentration of the Phytoalexin Resveratrol in Wine (1992)
- Climate Influences on Grapevine Phenology, Grape Composition, and Wine Production and Quality for Bordeaux, France (2000)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.