Stefano D’Amico
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 1%
- Food Science top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science top 10%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Regine SchöenlechnerSaroat RawdkuenSuphat PhongthaiWantida HomthawornchooC. GerdayGeorges FellerTony CollinsEmmerich Berghofer
- Topics
- Food composition and properties (30 papers)Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (16 papers)Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistryFood Chemistry
In The Last Decade
Stefano D’Amico
58 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Nutrition and Dietetics 587
- Food Science 562
- Molecular Biology 354
- Plant Science 345
- Insect Science 142
Countries citing papers authored by Stefano D’Amico
This map shows the geographic impact of Stefano D’Amico's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stefano D’Amico with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stefano D’Amico more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stefano D’Amico
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stefano D’Amico. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stefano D’Amico. The network helps show where Stefano D’Amico may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stefano D’Amico
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stefano D’Amico. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stefano D’Amico based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stefano D’Amico. Stefano D’Amico is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 41 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | COLOR AND LIGHT- INDUCED DISCOLORATION OF WOOD FROM THE TROPICAL SPECIES JATOBA AND AFRICAN PADAUK | 4 |
| 19 | 46 | |
| 20 | 125 |
About Stefano D’Amico
Stefano D’Amico is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Gastroenterology and Food Science, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food composition and properties (30 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (16 papers) and Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (587 citations), Food Science (562 citations) and Gastroenterology (109 citations). Stefano D’Amico has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Hungary and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Regine Schöenlechner, Saroat Rawdkuen, Suphat Phongthai, Wantida Homthawornchoo, C. Gerday, Georges Feller, Tony Collins, Emmerich Berghofer, Ulrich Müller and Konrad J. Domig. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.