Insect Science

741.8k papers and 15.2M indexed citations

About

741.8k papers covering Insect Science have received a total of 15.2M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Insect and Pesticide Research, Insect-Plant Interactions and Control and Plant and animal studies and also cover the fields of Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Molecular Biology. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Molecular Biology. Some of the most active scholars covering Insect Science are EJ Wood, Nancy A. Moran, Ian T. Baldwin, Marcel Dicke, Murray B. Isman, Angela E. Douglas, Thomas D. Bruns, Dave Goulson, John E. Casida and Paul Schmid‐Hempel.

In The Last Decade

Insect Science

112.7k papers receiving 1.1M citations

Fields of papers citing papers about Insect Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Insect Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Insect Science.

Countries where authors publish papers about Insect Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Insect Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Insect Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Insect Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026