Nina Hood
- Computer Science Applications top 0.5%
- Education top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Information Systems top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Allison LittlejohnColin MilliganMarek TesařMichael A. PetersJennifer CharterisBart RientiesE. Jayne WhiteRachel Buchanan
- Topics
- Online Learning and Analytics (9 papers)Online and Blended Learning (6 papers)Open Education and E-Learning (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
Nina Hood
30 papers receiving 801 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Computer Science Applications 548
- Education 457
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 216
- Information Systems 137
- Sociology and Political Science 73
Countries citing papers authored by Nina Hood
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Hood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Hood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Hood more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Hood
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Hood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Hood. The network helps show where Nina Hood may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Hood
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Hood. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Hood based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Hood. Nina Hood is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | Becoming an online editor: perceived roles and responsibilities of Wikipedia editors | 3 |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | Rethinking professional learning in higher education: a study on how the use of Open Educational Resources triggers the adoption of Open Educational Practice | 3 |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 39 | |
| 19 | 165 | |
| 20 | Transnational corporations and policy dilemmas : the problems of the machine-tool industry in the United Kingdom | 2 |
About Nina Hood
Nina Hood is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Education and Communication, having authored 31 papers that have together received 834 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online Learning and Analytics (9 papers), Online and Blended Learning (6 papers) and Open Education and E-Learning (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (548 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (216 citations) and Education (457 citations). Nina Hood has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Allison Littlejohn, Colin Milligan, Marek Tesař, Michael A. Peters, Jennifer Charteris, Bart Rienties, E. Jayne White, Rachel Buchanan, Martin Rehm and Andrew Gibbons. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Education, Higher Education and The Internet and Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.