Nesta Devine

807 citations
47 papers · 206 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Nesta Devine

39 papers receiving 187 citations

Peers

Nesta Devine
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Education 110
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 5
  • Sociology and Political Science 81
  • Cultural Studies 14
  • Music 5
Replace Nathalia E. Jaramillo with:
Nathalia E. Jaramillo United States
David Oswell United Kingdom
Arlo Kempf Canada
Richard A. Quantz United States
Naomi Hodgson United Kingdom
H. Svi Shapiro United States
Arto Kallioniemi Finland
Lisa Weems United States
Lynn Worsham United States
Ronald David Glass United States
Nesta Devine relative to Nathalia E. Jaramillo United States Nathalia E. Jaramillo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Nathalia E. Jaramillo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nesta Devine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nesta Devine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nesta Devine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nesta Devine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nesta Devine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nesta Devine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nesta Devine. The network helps show where Nesta Devine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nesta Devine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nesta Devine Line = papers co-authored together Nesta Devine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Interculturalism, Education and Dialogue
201226
2 201821
3
Education and Public Choice: A Critical Account of the Invisible Hand in Education
200420
4 201718
5 200518
6 201710
7 201810
8 20158
9 20207
10 20215
11 20225
12 20075
13 20215
14 20194
15 20233
16
Mata Pasifika as critique
20133
17 20183
18 20183
19 20173
20 20223

About Nesta Devine

Nesta Devine is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Education, Political Science and International Relations, Information Systems and Cultural Studies, having authored 47 papers that have together received 206 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Education and Society (5 papers), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (5 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (4 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (4 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (3 papers), Critical Race Theory in Education (2 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (2 papers) and Higher Education Practises and Engagement (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (110 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (5 citations), Sociology and Political Science (81 citations), Cultural Studies (14 citations) and Music (5 citations). Nesta Devine has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Georgina Stewart, Ruth Irwin, Leon Benadé, Michael A. Peters, Marek Tesař, Elizabeth Grierson, Petar Jandrić, Andrew Gibbons, Daniella J. Forster and Sonja Arndt. Their work appears in journals such as Educational Philosophy and Theory, Qualitative Inquiry, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, Knowledge Cultures and Pedagogy Culture and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact