Jonathan E. Booth

17 papers receiving 490 citations

Peers

Jonathan E. Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 242
  • Public Administration 31
  • Gender Studies 70
  • Strategy and Management 107
  • Social Psychology 140
Replace Jonathan R. Crawshaw with:
Jonathan R. Crawshaw United Kingdom
David Sikora United States
Jacob W. Breland United States
Liam P. Maher United States
Joyce Iun Hong Kong
Tyler Burch United States
Haoying Xu China
Karen S. Whelan‐Berry United States
Christine Unterrainer Austria
Oscar Holmes United States
Jonathan E. Booth relative to Jonathan R. Crawshaw United Kingdom Jonathan R. Crawshaw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jonathan R. Crawshaw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan E. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan E. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan E. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan E. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan E. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan E. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan E. Booth. The network helps show where Jonathan E. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan E. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan E. Booth Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan E. Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2009122
2 201494
3 201776
4 201667
5 201947
6 201921
7 201821
8 201616
9 202312
10 201810
11 20188
12 20234
13 20082
14 20242
15
Workplace silence, today? Transgender employees' voice and well-being
20191
16 20141
17 20131
18 20221
19 20070

About Jonathan E. Booth

Jonathan E. Booth is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management and General Health Professions, having authored 19 papers that have together received 506 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (7 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (4 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (2 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (2 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (242 citations), Public Administration (31 citations), Gender Studies (70 citations), Strategy and Management (107 citations) and Social Psychology (140 citations). Jonathan E. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Amanda Shantz, Theresa M. Glomb, Kyoung Won Park, T. Alexandra Beauregard, John Lynch, Kate P. Zipay, Jessica B. Rodell, Stephen Whittle, Elizabeth E. Stillwell and Michelle K. Duffy. Their work appears in journals such as Human Relations, Human Resource Management, British Journal of Industrial Relations, The International Journal of Human Resource Management and Academy of Management Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact