Human Relations

4.1k papers and 217.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.1k papers published in Human Relations in the last decades have received a total of 217.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Human Relations usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.7k papers), Sociology and Political Science (1.3k papers) and Social Psychology (785 papers) specifically the topics of Management and Organizational Studies (839 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (762 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (351 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human Relations are Léon Festinger, Mats Alvesson, Brendan McSweeney, Sonia Yeh, Sue Campbell Clark, Blake E. Ashforth, Yehuda Baruch, Eric Trist, Jennifer M. George and Brooks C. Holtom.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Human Relations

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Human Relations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human Relations.

Countries where authors publish in Human Relations

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human Relations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human Relations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Relations more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025