Mark Williams

667 citations
33 papers · 424 indexed · h-index 12
Topics
Employment and Welfare Studies (16 papers)Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (10 papers)Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers)

In The Last Decade

Mark Williams

31 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers

Mark Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Sociology and Political Science 180
  • General Health Professions 149
  • Economics and Econometrics 80
  • Safety Research 66
  • Social Psychology 59
Replace Chih Hoong Sin with:
Chih Hoong Sin United States
Natasha Cortis Australia
Rafael Muñoz de Bustillo Spain
Alireza Behtoui Sweden
Mette Lausten Denmark
Sue Richardson Australia
Louise Humpage New Zealand
Diana Opollo United States
Ofer Sharone United States
Karen Christensen Norway
Mark Williams relative to Chih Hoong Sin United States Chih Hoong Sin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Chih Hoong Sin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Williams. The network helps show where Mark Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Williams. Mark Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 1
4 6
5 10
6 16
7 7
8 10
9 3
10 9
11 35
12 11
13 10
14 20
15 20
16 16
17
Male student success initiative Creating Alignment Across College Communities
1
18 47
19 23
20 3

About Mark Williams

Mark Williams is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Health Professions and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 33 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (16 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (10 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (44 citations), Safety Research (66 citations) and General Health Professions (149 citations). Mark Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Yunsong Chen, Maria Koumenta, Ying Zhou, Susan Roberts, Matthew Colton, Richard Balon, Elliroma Gardiner, Michelle Riba, Thijs Bol and Jonathan E. Booth. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Organizational Behavior and Journal of Vocational Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026