Emma Russell
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Bree CarltonDorothy ScottShurlee SwainDanielle TysonAmy NetheryTarryn PhillipsPetros ChamakiotisScott Poynting
- Topics
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (16 papers)Crime Patterns and Interventions (9 papers)Sex work and related issues (6 papers)
- Journals
- Social ForcesEnvironment and Planning D Society and SpaceThe British Journal of Criminology
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Emma Russell
33 papers receiving 268 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Sociology and Political Science 201
- Clinical Psychology 78
- Political Science and International Relations 52
- General Health Professions 50
- Gender Studies 45
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Russell
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Russell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Russell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Russell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Russell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Russell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Russell. The network helps show where Emma Russell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Russell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Russell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Russell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Russell. Emma Russell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | Earwitnessing Detention: Carceral Secrecy, Affecting Voices, and Political Listening in The Messenger Podcast | 11 |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | A prison is not a home: Troubling 'therapeutic remand' for criminalised women | 0 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Emma Russell
Emma Russell is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Sociology and Political Science and Gender Studies, having authored 36 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (16 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (9 papers) and Sex work and related issues (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (29 citations), Gender Studies (45 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (201 citations). Emma Russell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Bree Carlton, Dorothy Scott, Shurlee Swain, Danielle Tyson, Amy Nethery, Tarryn Phillips, Petros Chamakiotis, Scott Poynting, Natalie Osborne and Chris Cunneen. Their work appears in journals such as Social Forces, Environment and Planning D Society and Space and The British Journal of Criminology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.