Ina Aust
Impact in
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Management and Organizational Studies
- Human Resource and Talent Management
- Marketing top 5%
- Environmental Sustainability in Business
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior 5
- Management and Organizational Studies 3
- Human Resource and Talent Management 1
-
- Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting 2
- Co-authors
- Michael Müller‐Camen (2 shared papers)Brian Matthews (1 shared paper)Julia Brandl (5 shared papers)Anne Keegan (5 shared papers)Sugumar Mariappanadar (1 shared paper)Thomas Van Waeyenberg (1 shared paper)Marco Guerci (1 shared paper)Adelien Decramer (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Ina Aust
12 papers receiving 506 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 301
- Marketing 157
- Strategy and Management 205
- Public Administration 19
- Management of Technology and Innovation 38
Countries citing papers authored by Ina Aust
This map shows the geographic impact of Ina Aust's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ina Aust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ina Aust more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ina Aust
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ina Aust. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ina Aust. The network helps show where Ina Aust may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Ina Aust, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Common Good HRM: A paradigm shift in Sustainable HRM? Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 254 |
| 2 | 2018 | 59 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 37 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 11 | Nachhaltigkeit im HR-Management – Spannungen aushalten, Widersprüche bewältigen | 2010 | 1 |
| 12 | Linking individual and organizational cultural competences: One step closer to multicultural organization | 2016 | 1 |
About Ina Aust
Ina Aust is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, General Health Professions, Marketing and Gender Studies, having authored 12 papers that have together received 542 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (3 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (2 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (2 papers) and Human Resource and Talent Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (301 citations), Marketing (157 citations), Strategy and Management (205 citations), Public Administration (19 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (38 citations). Ina Aust has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Austria and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michael Müller‐Camen, Brian Matthews, Julia Brandl, Anne Keegan, Sugumar Mariappanadar, Thomas Van Waeyenberg, Marco Guerci, Adelien Decramer, Pedro Miguel Romero Fernández and Macarena López‐Fernández. Their work appears in journals such as German Journal of Human Resource Management Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, Journal of Management Inquiry, Journal of Business Ethics, Human Resource Management Review and Sustainability.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.