Gender Studies
99.4k papers receiving 697.1k citations
Countries where authors publish papers about Gender Studies
This map shows the geographic impact of research in Gender Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Gender Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gender Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers about Gender Studies
This network shows the impact of papers covering Gender Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Gender Studies.
About Gender Studies
570.6k papers covering Gender Studies have received a total of 9.9M indexed citations since 1950 . Papers on Gender Studies are most often about the specific topic of Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics, Sports, Gender, and Society, Gender Diversity and Inequality, Diversity and Career in Medicine, Gender, Feminism, and Media, Gender Roles and Identity Studies, Media, Gender, and Advertising and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences and also cover the fields of Sociology and Political Science, Life-span and Life-course Studies, Communication, Accounting and Safety Research. Papers citing work on Gender Studies are usually about Sociology and Political Science, Health, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology and Demography. Some of the most active scholars covering Gender Studies are Gary S. Becker, Geert Hofstede, Alice H. Eagly, Murray A. Straus, Joan Acker, Lidia Sandra, Paul R. Amato, Raewyn Connell, Rabi S. Bhagat and Philip M. Podsakoff.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.