Countries where authors publish in Human Resource Management Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human Resource Management Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human Resource Management Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Resource Management Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Human Resource Management Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in Human Resource Management Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human Resource Management Review.
About Human Resource Management Review
The 1.0k papers published in Human Resource Management Review in the last decades have received a total of 84.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Human Resource Management Review usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (632 papers), Communication (123 papers) and Applied Psychology (90 papers) specifically the topics of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (378 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (121 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (101 papers), Employer Branding and e-HRM (100 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (94 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (89 papers), Human Resource and Talent Management (78 papers) and International Student and Expatriate Challenges (77 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human Resource Management Review are John P. Meyer, Natalie J. Allen, Raymond A. Noe, Howard M. Weiss, Sheng Wang, Dieter Zapf, John E. Delery, Teresa M. Amabile, David G. Collings and Paul E. Spector.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.