Medhanie Gaim
-
- Management and Organizational Studies 10
- Management Theory and Practice 4
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Innovation and Knowledge Management 9
-
- Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences 2
-
- Complex Systems and Decision Making 3
-
- Design Education and Practice 2
-
- Global and Cross-Cultural Management 1
-
- Public Policy and Administration Research 1
- Co-authors
- Miguel Piña e CunhaNils WåhlinStewart CleggSujith NairDimo DimovMarco BertiJoshua KellerRebecca Bednarek
- Cited by
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementBusiness and International ManagementStrategy and Management
In The Last Decade
Medhanie Gaim
16 papers receiving 363 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 168
- Business and International Management 23
- Strategy and Management 159
- Management of Technology and Innovation 68
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 10
Countries citing papers authored by Medhanie Gaim
This map shows the geographic impact of Medhanie Gaim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Medhanie Gaim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medhanie Gaim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Medhanie Gaim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Medhanie Gaim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Medhanie Gaim. The network helps show where Medhanie Gaim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Medhanie Gaim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 22 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 56 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 6 | Orchestrating Ecosystems : Interactive Spaces for Startup-Corporate Collaboration | 2020 | 2 |
| 7 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 54 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 63 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 34 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 14 | Paradox As the New Normal : essays on framing, managing and sustaining organizational tensions | 2017 | 7 |
| 15 | 2015 | 74 | |
| 16 | In search of a creative space : A conceptual framework of synthesizing paradoxes | 2013 | 1 |
About Medhanie Gaim
Medhanie Gaim is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management and Business and International Management, having authored 16 papers that have together received 382 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (10 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (9 papers), Management Theory and Practice (4 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (3 papers), Design Education and Practice (2 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (2 papers), Global and Cross-Cultural Management (1 paper) and Public Policy and Administration Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (168 citations), Business and International Management (23 citations) and Strategy and Management (159 citations). Medhanie Gaim has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Portugal and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Miguel Piña e Cunha, Nils Wåhlin, Stewart Clegg, Sujith Nair, Dimo Dimov, Marco Berti, Joshua Keller, Rebecca Bednarek, Garima Sharma and Camille Pradies. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Review, Organization Studies and European Management Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.