This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Selwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Selwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Selwood more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Selwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Selwood. The network helps show where Ian Selwood may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian Selwood
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian Selwood.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian Selwood based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ian Selwood. Ian Selwood is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Underwood, Jean, et al.. (2010). Understanding the Impact of Technology: Learner and School Level Factors. Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London).27 indexed citations
2.
Underwood, Jean, Thom Baguley, Phil Banyard, et al.. (2009). Personalising learning (theoretical perspective) - final report. Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London).2 indexed citations
3.
Banyard, Philip, et al.. (2008). Personalising of learning. Final report. Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository).2 indexed citations
4.
Underwood, Jean, et al.. (2007). Impact 2007: Personalising Learning with Technology. Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London).27 indexed citations
5.
Butt, Graham, et al.. (2007). Challenging and changing role boundaries.1 indexed citations
6.
Twining, Peter, Gerard F. Dillon, Andrew Jones, et al.. (2006). Introducing Tablet PCs in schools - a national study - some lessons learned. Open Research Online (The Open University).1 indexed citations
Twining, Peter, Dianne Cook, J. Ralston, & Ian Selwood. (2005). Tablet PCs in schools: case study report. Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London).15 indexed citations
9.
Underwood, Jean, et al.. (2005). The impact of Broadband in schools. Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London).18 indexed citations
10.
Twining, Peter, J. Ralston, Ian Selwood, et al.. (2005). Tablet PCs in schools: Case study report: A report for Becta by the Open University. Open Research Online (The Open University).17 indexed citations
11.
Banyard, Philip, et al.. (2004). Connecting with Broadband: the literature review. Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository).3 indexed citations
12.
Dillon, Gayle, Jean Underwood, Philip Banyard, et al.. (2004). Connecting with Broadband: evidence from the field. Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository).6 indexed citations
13.
Selwood, Ian, et al.. (2003). Management of education in the information age : the role of ICT : IFIP TC3/WG3.7 fifth Working Conference on Information Technology in Educational Management (ITEM 2002), August 18-22, 2002, Helsinki, Finland. Kluwer Academic eBooks.
14.
Selwood, Ian. (2003). Management of education in the information age: the role of ICT.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.