John F. Bauer
- Education top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Topics
- Online and Blended Learning (4 papers)Education and Technology Integration (3 papers)Gender and Technology in Education (3 papers)
- Journals
- New Directions for Teaching and LearningPubMedThe Journal of Technology and Teacher Education
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John F. Bauer
8 papers receiving 252 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Education 271
- Gender Studies 104
- Information Systems 78
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 57
- Sociology and Political Science 38
Countries citing papers authored by John F. Bauer
This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Bauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Bauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Bauer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Bauer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Bauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Bauer. The network helps show where John F. Bauer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John F. Bauer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John F. Bauer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John F. Bauer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John F. Bauer. John F. Bauer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Educational leaders: Preparing university teachers to meet student needs in online courses | 2 |
| 2 | Toward Technology Integration in the Schools: Why It Isn’t Happening | 277 |
| 3 | A Constructivist Stretch: Preservice Teachers Meet Preteens in a Technology-Based Literacy Project. | 1 |
| 4 | Assessment strategies for the on-line class : from theory to practice | 7 |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | Interpreting teaching practices in educational technology: A study of 30 teachers' utilization of computers in classroom instruction | 2 |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | A Technology Gender Divide: Perceived Skill and Frustration Levels among Female Preservice Teachers. | 8 |
| 9 | The Hot Line and its training problems for adolescent listeners. | 1 |
About John F. Bauer
John F. Bauer is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Education and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (4 papers), Education and Technology Integration (3 papers) and Gender and Technology in Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (104 citations), Education (271 citations) and Computer Science Applications (25 citations). John F. Bauer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey M. Kenton, R. S. Anderson, Bruce W. Speck and Deborah L. Lowther. Their work appears in journals such as New Directions for Teaching and Learning, PubMed and The Journal of Technology and Teacher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.