Max Longhurst

440 total citations
24 papers, 276 citations indexed

About

Max Longhurst is a scholar working on Education, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Max Longhurst has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 276 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Education, 10 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and 5 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Max Longhurst's work include Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (10 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers) and Gender and Technology in Education (5 papers). Max Longhurst is often cited by papers focused on Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (10 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers) and Gender and Technology in Education (5 papers). Max Longhurst collaborates with scholars based in United States, Jordan and Ireland. Max Longhurst's co-authors include Todd Campbell, Daniel C. Coster, Shiang‐Kwei Wang, Hui‐Yin Hsu, Paul G. Wolf, Brett E. Shelton, Suzanne Jones, Aaron M. Duffy, Nancy Mesner and Kurt Becker and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Science Education and Educational Technology Research and Development.

In The Last Decade

Max Longhurst

20 papers receiving 254 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Max Longhurst 196 78 54 53 39 24 276
David L. Silvernail 276 1.4× 73 0.9× 57 1.1× 48 0.9× 36 0.9× 46 343
Kelly Shapley 210 1.1× 108 1.4× 47 0.9× 49 0.9× 57 1.5× 20 296
Rodney S. Earle 289 1.5× 78 1.0× 34 0.6× 47 0.9× 57 1.5× 19 357
Catherine Maloney 189 1.0× 107 1.4× 48 0.9× 36 0.7× 57 1.5× 23 289
Gürkay Birinci 196 1.0× 99 1.3× 30 0.6× 33 0.6× 62 1.6× 5 346
Loretta Donovan 275 1.4× 102 1.3× 43 0.8× 61 1.2× 54 1.4× 25 340
John F. Bauer 271 1.4× 78 1.0× 38 0.7× 57 1.1× 104 2.7× 9 332
Rivka Wadmany 353 1.8× 135 1.7× 45 0.8× 67 1.3× 124 3.2× 17 432
Melissa Pierson 399 2.0× 120 1.5× 52 1.0× 98 1.8× 85 2.2× 23 519
Mesut Duran 201 1.0× 40 0.5× 27 0.5× 50 0.9× 40 1.0× 21 301

Countries citing papers authored by Max Longhurst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Longhurst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Longhurst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Longhurst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Longhurst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Longhurst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Longhurst. The network helps show where Max Longhurst may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Max Longhurst

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Max Longhurst. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Max Longhurst based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Max Longhurst. Max Longhurst is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Longhurst, Max, et al.. (2025). Lesson Planning: Bridging Conceptual to Practical Engineering Design Classroom Activity. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 1–28.
2.
Longhurst, Max, et al.. (2024). Using Lessons from History to Guide the Implementation of AI in Science Education. The Science Teacher. 91(2). 29–34. 1 indexed citations
3.
Leary, Heather, et al.. (2024). Technology-mediated lesson study: a step-by-step guide. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies. 13(5). 1–14. 4 indexed citations
4.
Coster, Daniel C., et al.. (2024). Development and validation of a high school agricultural literacy assessment. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(3). 91–104.
5.
Longhurst, Max, et al.. (2022). Watersheds, Communities, and Collaboration. Science and Children. 59(4). 21–25. 2 indexed citations
6.
Campbell, Todd, et al.. (2021). Next generation science classrooms: The development of a questionnaire for examining student experiences in science classrooms. School Science and Mathematics. 121(2). 96–109. 4 indexed citations
7.
Moyer‐Packenham, Patricia S., et al.. (2021). Teachers' Conceptions of Mathematics and the Use of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Calculators, Dynamic Geometry Software and Desmos in the Classroom. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching. 40(3). 201–227. 1 indexed citations
8.
Longhurst, Max, et al.. (2020). Measuring Agricultural Literacy: Grade 3-5 Instrument Development and Validation. Journal of Agricultural Education. 61(2). 173–192. 2 indexed citations
9.
Becker, Kurt, et al.. (2020). Factors Influencing the Interest Level of Secondary Students going into STEM fields and their parents’ perceived interest in STEM (Evaluation). Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 3 indexed citations
10.
Jones, Suzanne, et al.. (2019). Collective Class Actuation: A Phenomenological Case Study of Dynamic Equilibrium in the Classroom.. 13(4). 289–304.
11.
Longhurst, Max, Suzanne Jones, & Todd Campbell. (2017). Factors influencing teacher appropriation of professional learning focused on the use of technology in science classrooms. Teacher Development. 21(3). 365–387. 12 indexed citations
12.
Longhurst, Max, et al.. (2017). Teacher learning in technology professional development and its impact on student achievement in science. International Journal of Science Education. 39(10). 1282–1303. 28 indexed citations
13.
Longhurst, Max, et al.. (2016). Multi‐Year Professional Development Grounded in Educative Curriculum Focused on Integrating Technology With Reformed Science Teaching Principles. School Science and Mathematics. 116(8). 430–441. 5 indexed citations
14.
Campbell, Todd, et al.. (2014). An Examination of the Changes in Science Teaching Orientations and Technology-Enhanced Tools for Student Learning in the Context of Professional Development. International Journal of Science Education. 36(11). 1815–1848. 23 indexed citations
15.
Wang, Shiang‐Kwei, Hui‐Yin Hsu, Todd Campbell, Daniel C. Coster, & Max Longhurst. (2014). An investigation of middle school science teachers and students use of technology inside and outside of classrooms: considering whether digital natives are more technology savvy than their teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development. 62(6). 637–662. 150 indexed citations
16.
Campbell, Todd, Max Longhurst, Aaron M. Duffy, Paul G. Wolf, & Brett E. Shelton. (2013). Science Teaching Orientations and Technology-Enhanced Tools for Student Learning. Research in Science Education. 43(5). 2035–2057. 10 indexed citations
17.
Campbell, Todd, et al.. (2013). Gaming as a Platform for Developing Science Practices. Science Activities. 50(3). 90–98. 2 indexed citations
18.
Campbell, Todd, Max Longhurst, Aaron M. Duffy, Paul G. Wolf, & Brett E. Shelton. (2012). Technology Use in Science Classrooms and Reformed Teaching. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University).
19.
Longhurst, Max, et al.. (2000). Enhance ONE Year of Education.. 1(1). 40–47. 1 indexed citations
20.
Longhurst, Max. (1976). THE CALIFORNIA DEER DECLINE AND POSSIBILITIES FOR RESTORATION. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David L. Silvernail Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kelly Shapley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rodney S. Earle Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Catherine Maloney Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gürkay Birinci Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Loretta Donovan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by John F. Bauer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rivka Wadmany Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Melissa Pierson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mesut Duran
Rankless by CCL
2026