Phil Banyard

902 total citations · 1 hit paper
18 papers, 649 citations indexed

About

Phil Banyard is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Phil Banyard has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 649 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Education, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Phil Banyard's work include Education and Technology Integration (4 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (3 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers). Phil Banyard is often cited by papers focused on Education and Technology Integration (4 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (3 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers). Phil Banyard collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Türkiye and Slovenia. Phil Banyard's co-authors include Mark D. Griffiths, Jean Underwood, Adam Joinson, Ian Selwood, Gayle Dillon, Thom Baguley, Lee Farrington‐Flint, Helen Elliott, Rebecca Lievesley and Nicholas Blagden and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Technology Pedagogy and Education and Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education.

In The Last Decade

Phil Banyard

17 papers receiving 558 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Prevalence of Pathological Internet Use among University Students and Correlations with Self-Esteem, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), and Disinhibition

2005 488 citations Mark D. Griffiths, Phil Banyard et al. CyberPsychology & Behavior profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Phil Banyard United Kingdom	8	465	346	121	115	55	18	649
GeunYoung Chang South Korea	5	614 1.3×	285 0.8×	126 1.0×	128 1.1×	72 1.3×	8	680
Yalda T. Uhls United States	10	399 0.9×	312 0.9×	116 1.0×	120 1.0×	80 1.5×	16	658
Leo Sang-Min Whang South Korea	3	609 1.3×	284 0.8×	126 1.0×	128 1.1×	72 1.3×	7	673
Francisca González-Gil Spain	10	398 0.9×	406 1.2×	81 0.7×	64 0.6×	37 0.7×	26	665
Bahadır Bozoğlan Türkiye	7	279 0.6×	191 0.6×	99 0.8×	69 0.6×	44 0.8×	13	434
Hyunjoo Lee South Korea	9	293 0.6×	289 0.8×	74 0.6×	76 0.7×	28 0.5×	28	599
John C. Belland United States	5	481 1.0×	329 1.0×	95 0.8×	126 1.1×	57 1.0×	15	624
Sabah Balta Türkiye	10	357 0.8×	176 0.5×	152 1.3×	56 0.5×	42 0.8×	15	547
Hananel Rosenberg Israel	13	309 0.7×	230 0.7×	59 0.5×	95 0.8×	33 0.6×	46	536
Anja Stević Austria	13	510 1.1×	145 0.4×	152 1.3×	141 1.2×	90 1.6×	30	718

Countries citing papers authored by Phil Banyard

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Banyard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Banyard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Banyard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Banyard

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Banyard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Banyard. The network helps show where Phil Banyard may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phil Banyard

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phil Banyard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phil Banyard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phil Banyard. Phil Banyard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

Winder, Belinda, et al.. (2023). ‘There is nothing for me’: A qualitative analysis of the views towards prison education of adult male prisoners convicted of a sexual offence. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice. 62(3). 391–407.

Banyard, Phil, et al.. (2022). Academics’ Intentions to Use Open Educational Resources (OERs) in Professional Development. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 12(3). 27–46. 4 indexed citations

Lievesley, Rebecca, et al.. (2020). Sexual Crime and Intellectual Functioning. Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository). 1 indexed citations

Banyard, Phil, et al.. (2020). Engagement in Distance Education Settings: A Trend Analysis. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 21(1). 101–120. 24 indexed citations

Winder, Belinda, et al.. (2019). Sexual Crime, Religion and Spirituality. Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository). 1 indexed citations

Blagden, Nicholas, et al.. (2019). Sexual Crime and the Experience of Imprisonment. Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository). 6 indexed citations

Betts, Lucy R., et al.. (2019). Developing a competency‐based education training programme for university tutors. Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository). 4(4). 5 indexed citations

Lievesley, Rebecca, et al.. (2018). Sexual Crime and Prevention. 5 indexed citations

Elliott, Helen, et al.. (2018). Sexual Crime and Circles of Support and Accountability. Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository). 1 indexed citations

10.

Underwood, Jean, et al.. (2010). Understanding the Impact of Technology: Learner and School Level Factors. Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London). 27 indexed citations

11.

Underwood, Jean, Thom Baguley, Phil Banyard, et al.. (2009). Personalising learning (theoretical perspective) - final report. Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London). 2 indexed citations

12.

Underwood, Jean & Phil Banyard. (2008). Managers’, teachers’ and learners’ perceptions of personalised learning: evidence from Impact 2007. Technology Pedagogy and Education. 17(3). 233–246. 11 indexed citations

13.

Underwood, Jean, et al.. (2007). Impact 2007: Personalising Learning with Technology. Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London). 27 indexed citations

14.

Griffiths, Mark D., et al.. (2005). Prevalence of Pathological Internet Use among University Students and Correlations with Self-Esteem, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), and Disinhibition. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 8(6). 562–570. 488 indexed citations breakdown →

15.

Underwood, Jean, et al.. (2005). The impact of Broadband in schools. Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London). 18 indexed citations

16.

Banyard, Phil. (2003). Controversies in Psychology. 6 indexed citations

17.

Joinson, Adam & Phil Banyard. (2003). Seeking alcohol information on the Internet. Aslib Proceedings. 55(5/6). 313–319. 8 indexed citations

18.

Joinson, Adam & Phil Banyard. (2002). Psychological aspects of information seeking on the Internet. Aslib Proceedings. 54(2). 95–102. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact