Educational Review

2.0k papers and 28.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Educational Review in the last decades have received a total of 28.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Educational Review usually cover Education (1.2k papers), Sociology and Political Science (455 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (229 papers) specifically the topics of Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (267 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (198 papers) and Parental Involvement in Education (164 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Educational Review are Chris Kyriacou, Nicholas Stock, Garry Hornby, Richard Bailey, Christine Skelton, Howard Giles, Lynn Davies, Hilary Janks, Janet Goodall and P. Taylor Webb.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Educational Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Educational Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Educational Review.

Countries where authors publish in Educational Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Educational Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Educational Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Educational Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025