Emily Heaphy
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jane E. DuttonMarcial LosadaGretchen M. SpreitzerJohn Paul StephensLaura Morgan RobertsRobert E. QuinnSarah WrightRyan K. Gottfredson
- Topics
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (13 papers)Management and Organizational Studies (11 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Emily Heaphy
28 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 989
- Social Psychology 909
- Sociology and Political Science 494
- Clinical Psychology 485
- Strategy and Management 284
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Heaphy
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Heaphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Heaphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Heaphy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Heaphy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Heaphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Heaphy. The network helps show where Emily Heaphy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Heaphy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Heaphy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Heaphy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Heaphy. Emily Heaphy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 43 | |
| 9 | 137 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 46 | |
| 12 | 67 | |
| 13 | 110 | |
| 14 | 94 | |
| 15 | The Role of Positivity and Connectivity in the Performance of Business Teams | 39 |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | Ponga el acento en sus fortalezas | 3 |
| 19 | 293 | |
| 20 | American Professionalism: Contents and Consequences of an Organizational Role Schema | 2 |
About Emily Heaphy
Emily Heaphy is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (13 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (11 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (989 citations), Social Psychology (909 citations) and Applied Psychology (220 citations). Emily Heaphy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jane E. Dutton, Marcial Losada, Gretchen M. Spreitzer, John Paul Stephens, Laura Morgan Roberts, Robert E. Quinn, Sarah Wright, Ryan K. Gottfredson, Abraham Carmeli and Barbara L. Fredrickson. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Review, Academy of Management Journal and Organization Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.