Emily Heaphy

3.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
29 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Emily Heaphy is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Heaphy has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 9 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Emily Heaphy's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (13 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (11 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers). Emily Heaphy is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (13 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (11 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers). Emily Heaphy collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Emily Heaphy's co-authors include Jane E. Dutton, Marcial Losada, Gretchen M. Spreitzer, John Paul Stephens, Laura Morgan Roberts, Robert E. Quinn, Sarah Wright, Ryan K. Gottfredson, Abraham Carmeli and Barbara L. Fredrickson and has published in prestigious journals such as Academy of Management Review, Academy of Management Journal and Organization Science.

In The Last Decade

Emily Heaphy

28 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Positive psychology in a pandemic: buffering, bolstering, and building mental health

2021 245 citations Jane E. Dutton, Barbara L. Fredrickson et al. profile →

Peers

Emily Heaphy

OBHRM

SP

SPS

CP

SM

Joseph C. Rode United States

Andreas W. Richter United Kingdom

Barbara Wisse Netherlands

Laura M. Little United States

Janaki Gooty United States

Winny Shen Canada

Robert B. Kaiser United States

Megan W. Gerhardt United States

Uta K. Bindl United Kingdom

Frank D. Belschak Netherlands

Joseph C. Rode United States

Emily Heaphy

754 ×0.8

OBHRM

885 ×1.0

SP

317 ×0.6

SPS

348 ×0.7

CP

199 ×0.7

SM

Citations per year, relative to Emily Heaphy Emily Heaphy (= 1×) peers Joseph C. Rode

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Heaphy

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Heaphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Heaphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Heaphy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Heaphy

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Heaphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Heaphy. The network helps show where Emily Heaphy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Heaphy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Heaphy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Heaphy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Heaphy. Emily Heaphy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Phillips, Nelson, Thomas B. Lawrence, Brianna Barker Caza, Emily Heaphy, & Hannes Leroy. (2025). Extending the Turn to Work: New Directions in the Study of Social‐Symbolic Work in Organizational Life. Journal of Management Studies. 62(8). 3287–3311. 4 indexed citations

2.

Heaphy, Emily, et al.. (2023). Hiding in Plain Sight: Co-Enacting the Sustainable Worker Schema in a Consulting Firm. Organization Science. 35(4). 1271–1298. 7 indexed citations

3.

Caza, Brianna Barker, Emily Heaphy, Laura Morgan Roberts, & Gretchen M. Spreitzer. (2023). Revaluing Ordinary Moments: Disrupting Gendered Positive Self-Concepts through a Narrative Feedback Intervention. Academy of Management Discoveries. 10(1). 38–62. 3 indexed citations

4.

Gottfredson, Ryan K., Sarah Wright, & Emily Heaphy. (2022). A critical review of relationship quality measures: Is a fresh start needed? An agenda to move forward. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 95(3). 624–659. 11 indexed citations

5.

Lawrence, Thomas B., et al.. (2022). Organizational Body Work: Efforts to Shape Human Bodies in Organizations. Academy of Management Annals. 17(1). 37–73. 28 indexed citations

6.

Heaphy, Emily, et al.. (2021). Moved to speak up: How prosocial emotions influence the employee voice process. Human Relations. 75(6). 1113–1139. 18 indexed citations

7.

Humberd, Beth K., Emily Heaphy, William A. Kahn, et al.. (2018). Complicating Connection: Unpacking Affection, Attraction, and Intimacy at Work. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2018(1). 11842–11842.

8.

Heaphy, Emily, Kris Byron, Gary A. Ballinger, et al.. (2018). Introduction to Special Topic Forum: The Changing Nature of Work Relationships. Academy of Management Review. 43(4). 558–569. 43 indexed citations

9.

Kahn, William A., Michelle Barton, Colin M. Fisher, et al.. (2017). The Geography of Strain: Organizational Resilience as a Function of Intergroup Relations. Academy of Management Review. 43(3). 509–529. 137 indexed citations

10.

Wright, Sarah, Ryan K. Gottfredson, & Emily Heaphy. (2017). Measuring the Quality of Work Relationships: A Critical Review of Survey Instruments. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2017(1). 14263–14263. 1 indexed citations

11.

Uhlmann, Eric Luis, Emily Heaphy, Susan J. Ashford, Luke Zhu, & Jeffrey Sanchez‐Burks. (2013). Acting professional: An exploration of culturally bounded norms against nonwork role referencing. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 34(6). 866–886. 46 indexed citations

12.

Heaphy, Emily. (2013). Repairing Breaches with Rules: Maintaining Institutions in the Face of Everyday Disruptions. Organization Science. 24(5). 1291–1315. 67 indexed citations

13.

Stephens, John Paul, Emily Heaphy, & Jane E. Dutton. (2011). High-quality Connections. Oxford University Press eBooks. 110 indexed citations

14.

Brown, Stephanie L., Barbara L. Fredrickson, Michelle M. Wirth, et al.. (2009). Social closeness increases salivary progesterone in humans. Hormones and Behavior. 56(1). 108–111. 94 indexed citations

15.

Losada, Marcial & Emily Heaphy. (2009). The Role of Positivity and Connectivity in the Performance of Business Teams. 39 indexed citations

16.

Heaphy, Emily & Jane E. Dutton. (2006). Positive Social Interactions and the Human Body at Work: Linking Organizations and Physiology. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations

17.

Heaphy, Emily, Jeffrey Sanchez‐Burks, & Susan J. Ashford. (2006). Cultural Impressions of Professionalism. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations

18.

Spreitzer, Gretchen M., et al.. (2005). Ponga el acento en sus fortalezas. Harvard business review. 83(1). 62–68. 3 indexed citations

19.

Losada, Marcial & Emily Heaphy. (2004). The Role of Positivity and Connectivity in the Performance of Business Teams. American Behavioral Scientist. 47(6). 740–765. 293 indexed citations

20.

Heaphy, Emily. (2004). American Professionalism: Contents and Consequences of an Organizational Role Schema. Deep Blue (University of Michigan). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact