Caroline Straub

992 citations
18 papers · 338 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Caroline Straub

15 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers

Caroline Straub
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 193
  • Gender Studies 75
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 37
  • Social Psychology 106
  • Sociology and Political Science 204
Replace Ana M. Lucia‐Casademunt with:
Ana M. Lucia‐Casademunt Spain
Tomika W. Greer United States
Geraldine Grady Ireland
Katina W. Thompson United States
Wee Chan Au United Kingdom
Benjamin Schneider United Kingdom
Bernadette M. Gailliard United States
Sara N. King United States
Jutta Solga Germany
Todd Woodruff United States
Caroline Straub relative to Ana M. Lucia‐Casademunt Spain Ana M. Lucia‐Casademunt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Ana M. Lucia‐Casademunt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Straub

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Straub's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Straub with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Straub more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Straub

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Straub. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Straub. The network helps show where Caroline Straub may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Caroline Straub, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Caroline Straub Line = papers co-authored together Caroline Straub links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2011112
2 200760
3 200734
4 201933
5 201729
6 202129
7 201814
8 20237
9 20216
10 20125
11
Work-family issues in contemporary Europe
20093
12 20243
13 20221
14 20171
15 20221
16 20250
17 20200
18 20190

About Caroline Straub

Caroline Straub is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Demography, Gender Studies and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 18 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Work-Family Balance Challenges (6 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers), Workaholism, burnout, and well-being (3 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (3 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (3 papers) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (193 citations), Gender Studies (75 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (37 citations), Social Psychology (106 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (204 citations). Caroline Straub has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include C.J. Vinkenburg, Barbara Beham, Yingying Zhang, Gazi Islam, Kim Klyver, René Mauer, Joeri Hofmans, Daniel Spurk, David B. Balkin and Len J. Treviño. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, Journal of Business Venturing and Journal of Career Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact