Journal of Business Venturing

1.5k papers and 226.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Journal of Business Venturing in the last decades have received a total of 226.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Business Venturing usually cover Management of Technology and Innovation (935 papers), Accounting (700 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (388 papers) specifically the topics of Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (929 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (514 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (422 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Business Venturing are Shaker A. Zahra, Dean A. Shepherd, Per Davidsson, Robert A. Baron, Scott Shane, William B. Gartner, William J. Baumöl, Ethan Mollick, Sue Birley and Benson Honig.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Business Venturing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Business Venturing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Business Venturing.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Business Venturing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Business Venturing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Business Venturing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Business Venturing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025