Journal of Vocational Behavior

3.5k papers and 235.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.5k papers published in Journal of Vocational Behavior in the last decades have received a total of 235.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Vocational Behavior usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.2k papers), Safety Research (1.2k papers) and Social Psychology (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Career Development and Diversity (1.1k papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (1.1k papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (505 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Vocational Behavior are Arnold B. Bakker, Robert W. Lent, Tammy D. Allen, Gail Hackett, John P. Meyer, Donald E. Super, Richard M. Steers, Steven D. Brown, Richard T. Mowday and Lyman W. Porter.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Vocational Behavior

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Vocational Behavior. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Vocational Behavior.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Vocational Behavior

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Vocational Behavior. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Vocational Behavior with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Vocational Behavior more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025