Anne Looney

926 total citations
15 papers, 509 citations indexed

About

Anne Looney is a scholar working on Education, Information Systems and Management and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne Looney has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 509 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Education, 6 papers in Information Systems and Management and 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Anne Looney's work include Student Assessment and Feedback (6 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (6 papers) and Higher Education Learning Practices (4 papers). Anne Looney is often cited by papers focused on Student Assessment and Feedback (6 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (6 papers) and Higher Education Learning Practices (4 papers). Anne Looney collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Ireland and United States. Anne Looney's co-authors include Fabienne van der Kleij, Joy Cumming, Karen R. Harris, Claire Wyatt‐Smith, Valentina Klenowski, Lorna Earl, Graham Donaldson, Menucha Birenbaum, Paulo Santiago and Deborah Nusche and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Curriculum Studies, Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice and The Curriculum Journal.

In The Last Decade

Anne Looney

15 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers

Anne Looney
Nicky Dulfer Australia
Susie Groves Australia
Jan De Winter United Kingdom
Matt O’Leary United Kingdom
John S. Zeuli United States
Mei Kuin Lai New Zealand
Louisa Coles United Kingdom
Nicky Dulfer Australia
Anne Looney
Citations per year, relative to Anne Looney Anne Looney (= 1×) peers Nicky Dulfer

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Looney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Looney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Looney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Looney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Looney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Looney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Looney. The network helps show where Anne Looney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Looney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Looney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Looney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Looney. Anne Looney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Volante, Louis, Christopher DeLuca, Nicole Barnes, et al.. (2024). International trends in the implementation of assessment for learning revisited: Implications for policy and practice in a post-COVID world. Policy Futures in Education. 23(1). 224–242. 6 indexed citations
2.
Looney, Anne, et al.. (2023). Teacher professionalism in policy texts in the Republic of Ireland; a critical discourse analysis. Irish Educational Studies. 43(4). 1407–1428. 2 indexed citations
3.
Gleeson, Jim, Valentina Klenowski, & Anne Looney. (2020). Curriculum change in Australia and Ireland: a comparative study of recent reforms. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 52(4). 478–497. 28 indexed citations
4.
Kleij, Fabienne van der, Joy Cumming, & Anne Looney. (2017). Policy expectations and support for teacher formative assessment in Australian education reform. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice. 25(6). 620–637. 30 indexed citations
5.
Looney, Anne, Joy Cumming, Fabienne van der Kleij, & Karen R. Harris. (2017). Reconceptualising the role of teachers as assessors: teacher assessment identity. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice. 25(5). 442–467. 190 indexed citations
6.
Looney, Anne, et al.. (2017). Romania 2017. 10 indexed citations
7.
Birenbaum, Menucha, Christopher DeLuca, Lorna Earl, et al.. (2015). International trends in the implementation of assessment for learning: Implications for policy and practice. Policy Futures in Education. 13(1). 117–140. 102 indexed citations
8.
Santiago, Paulo, Graham Donaldson, Anne Looney, & Deborah Nusche. (2012). OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Portugal 2012. DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven). 34 indexed citations
9.
Shewbridge, Claire, Eunice Eunhee Jang, Peter Matthews, et al.. (2011). OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education. OECD eBooks. 37 indexed citations
10.
Looney, Anne & Valentina Klenowski. (2008). Curriculum and assessment for the knowledge society: interrogating experiences in the Republic of Ireland and Queensland, Australia. The Curriculum Journal. 19(3). 177–192. 1 indexed citations
11.
Klenowski, Valentina, et al.. (2007). Moderation as Judgement Practice: Reconciling System Level Accountability and Local Level Practice. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 29(1). 10. 26 indexed citations
12.
Looney, Anne. (2006). Assessment in the Republic of Ireland. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice. 13(3). 345–353. 17 indexed citations
13.
Looney, Anne & Mark Morgan. (2001). A gendered curriculum? An investigation of some aspects of curriculum provision in post‐primary schools. Irish Educational Studies. 20(1). 73–83. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026