The Curriculum Journal

938 papers and 11.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 938 papers published in The Curriculum Journal in the last decades have received a total of 11.6k indexed citations. Papers published in The Curriculum Journal usually cover Education (721 papers), Sociology and Political Science (371 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (181 papers) specifically the topics of Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (245 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (206 papers) and Global Educational Policies and Reforms (164 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Curriculum Journal are Wynne Harlen, Michael Young, Mark Priestley, Roger Firth, David Scott, Mary James, Julia Flutter, Anne Edwards, David Pedder and Ruth Deakin Crick.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Curriculum Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Curriculum Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Curriculum Journal.

Countries where authors publish in The Curriculum Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Curriculum Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Curriculum Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Curriculum Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025