Steven Holtzman

597 total citations
40 papers, 345 citations indexed

About

Steven Holtzman is a scholar working on Education, Social Psychology and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Steven Holtzman has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 345 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Education, 8 papers in Social Psychology and 7 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in Steven Holtzman's work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (7 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (6 papers) and Text Readability and Simplification (5 papers). Steven Holtzman is often cited by papers focused on Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (7 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (6 papers) and Text Readability and Simplification (5 papers). Steven Holtzman collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Czechia. Steven Holtzman's co-authors include John Sabatini, Jane Shore, Richard D. Roberts, Jeremy Burrus, Colin Scott, Daniel F. McCaffrey, Hollis S. Scarborough, Jill Burstein, Carolyn MacCann and David M. Klieger and has published in prestigious journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Science Education and International Journal of Science Education.

In The Last Decade

Steven Holtzman

36 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Steven Holtzman United States 11 157 78 54 40 36 40 345
Stuart Shaw United Kingdom 12 213 1.4× 93 1.2× 39 0.7× 22 0.6× 24 0.7× 30 427
Katerina Bohle Carbonell Netherlands 8 206 1.3× 80 1.0× 55 1.0× 26 0.7× 46 1.3× 11 382
Sherria Hoskins United Kingdom 7 256 1.6× 74 0.9× 52 1.0× 29 0.7× 22 0.6× 11 375
Bella Ross Australia 13 269 1.7× 63 0.8× 21 0.4× 34 0.8× 35 1.0× 38 493
Bob Ives United States 12 144 0.9× 64 0.8× 67 1.2× 25 0.6× 13 0.4× 24 414
Marié De Beer South Africa 8 103 0.7× 61 0.8× 59 1.1× 44 1.1× 26 0.7× 33 279
Jennifer Randall United States 13 410 2.6× 90 1.2× 52 1.0× 50 1.3× 38 1.1× 38 626
Beate Baltes United States 8 87 0.6× 58 0.7× 92 1.7× 23 0.6× 10 0.3× 24 335
Cathy Wendler United States 9 207 1.3× 77 1.0× 59 1.1× 18 0.5× 44 1.2× 29 442
María Verónica Santelices Chile 9 262 1.7× 30 0.4× 32 0.6× 21 0.5× 26 0.7× 19 386

Countries citing papers authored by Steven Holtzman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Holtzman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Holtzman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Holtzman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven Holtzman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Holtzman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Holtzman. The network helps show where Steven Holtzman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven Holtzman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven Holtzman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven Holtzman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven Holtzman. Steven Holtzman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bridgeman, Brent, et al.. (2023). The GRE as a predictor of persistence to a PhD. Frontiers in Education. 8. 1 indexed citations
2.
Ober, Teresa, Kevin M. Williams, Harrison J. Kell, & Steven Holtzman. (2023). Measuring coachability by situational judgment task: Development and initial validation. Personality and Individual Differences. 219. 112503–112503.
3.
Williams, Kevin M., et al.. (2023). Employer Expectations of 21st‐Century High School Graduates: Analyzing Online Job Advertisements. ETS Research Report Series. 2023(1). 1–19. 1 indexed citations
4.
Klieger, David M., et al.. (2022). Using third-party evaluations to assess socioemotional skills in graduate and professional school admissions. International Journal of Testing. 22(1). 72–99. 1 indexed citations
5.
Castellano, Katherine E., et al.. (2022). Examining Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Answer Changing Behavior on a Content Knowledge for Teaching Science Assessment. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 31(4). 528–541.
6.
Ling, Guangming, Norbert Elliot, Jill Burstein, et al.. (2021). Writing motivation: A validation study of self-judgment and performance. Assessing Writing. 48. 100509–100509. 24 indexed citations
7.
Oliveri, María Elena, et al.. (2017). A Multilevel Factor Analysis of Third-Party Evaluations of Noncognitive Constructs Used in Admissions Decision Making. Applied Measurement in Education. 30(4). 297–313. 3 indexed citations
8.
Liu, Ou Lydia, et al.. (2016). An Investigation of the Use and Predictive Validity of Scores from the "GRE"® revised General Test in a Singaporean University. ETS GRE® Board Research Report. ETS GRE®-16-01. ETS Research Report. RR-16-05.. ETS Research Report Series. 2 indexed citations
9.
Liu, Ou Lydia, et al.. (2016). An Investigation of the Use and Predictive Validity of Scores From the GRE® revised General Test in a Singaporean University. ETS Research Report Series. 2016(1). 1–24. 6 indexed citations
10.
Holtzman, Steven, et al.. (2016). Better Feedback for Better Teaching: A Practical Guide to Improving Classroom Observations.. 31 indexed citations
11.
Klieger, David M., et al.. (2014). New Perspectives on the Validity of the "GRE"® General Test for Predicting Graduate School Grades. ETS GRE® Board Research Report. ETS GRE®-14-03. ETS Research Report. RR-14-26.. ETS Research Report Series. 4 indexed citations
12.
Holtzman, Steven, et al.. (2014). Building Trust in Observations: A Blueprint for Improving Systems to Support Great Teaching. Policy and Practice Brief. MET Project.. 1 indexed citations
13.
Holtzman, Steven, et al.. (2014). Evaluation of Psychosocial Problems Among African University Students in Uganda: Development and Validation of a Screening Instrument. Journal of Psychology Research. 4(2). 2 indexed citations
15.
Burrus, Jeremy, et al.. (2013). Examining the Efficacy of a Time Management Intervention for High School Students. Research Report. ETS RR-13-25.. ETS Research Report Series. 2 indexed citations
16.
Burrus, Jeremy, et al.. (2013). EXAMINING THE EFFICACY OF A TIME MANAGEMENT INTERVENTION FOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS. ETS Research Report Series. 2013(2). 12 indexed citations
17.
Burstein, Jill, et al.. (2012). The "Language Muse"? System: Linguistically Focused Instructional Authoring. Research Report. ETS RR-12-21.. ETS Research Report Series. 3 indexed citations
18.
Burrus, Jeremy, et al.. (2012). Emotional Intelligence Relates to Well‐Being: Evidence from the Situational Judgment Test of Emotional Management. Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being. 4(2). 151–166. 46 indexed citations
19.
Young, John W., Steven Holtzman, & Jonathan Steinberg. (2011). Score Comparability for Language Minority Students on the Content Assessments Used by Two States. Research Report. ETS RR-11-27..
20.
Sabatini, John, Jane Shore, Steven Holtzman, & Hollis S. Scarborough. (2011). Relative Effectiveness of Reading Intervention Programs for Adults With Low Literacy. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness. 4(2). 118–133. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026