Frederick Cline

440 total citations
39 papers, 304 citations indexed

About

Frederick Cline is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Education and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Frederick Cline has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 304 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 12 papers in Education and 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Frederick Cline's work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (14 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (9 papers) and Disability Education and Employment (7 papers). Frederick Cline is often cited by papers focused on Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (14 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (9 papers) and Disability Education and Employment (7 papers). Frederick Cline collaborates with scholars based in United States. Frederick Cline's co-authors include Brent Bridgeman, Linda L. Cook, Nancy Burton, Jonathan Steinberg, Yasuyo Sawaki, Elizabeth A. Stone, David M. Klieger, Steven Holtzman, Daniel R. Eignor and Christopher Johnstone and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Research in Higher Education and Journal of Educational Measurement.

In The Last Decade

Frederick Cline

38 papers receiving 249 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Frederick Cline United States 11 107 105 83 60 56 39 304
April L. Zenisky United States 11 183 1.7× 229 2.2× 28 0.3× 106 1.8× 12 0.2× 30 467
S. E. Phillips United States 10 85 0.8× 188 1.8× 155 1.9× 124 2.1× 21 0.4× 31 409
Anne R. Fitzpatrick United States 10 170 1.6× 110 1.0× 14 0.2× 55 0.9× 18 0.3× 18 333
Catherine M. Hombo United States 4 49 0.5× 239 2.3× 23 0.3× 68 1.1× 10 0.2× 7 369
Avi Allalouf United States 8 147 1.4× 106 1.0× 9 0.1× 95 1.6× 20 0.4× 14 318
Janice Dowd Scheuneman United States 9 187 1.7× 120 1.1× 13 0.2× 72 1.2× 25 0.4× 23 370
Michal Beller Israel 6 34 0.3× 169 1.6× 23 0.3× 48 0.8× 23 0.4× 12 279
Gilbert Sax United States 13 119 1.1× 181 1.7× 11 0.1× 57 0.9× 35 0.6× 24 426
C. Nicholas Hastings United States 7 99 0.9× 124 1.2× 15 0.2× 117 1.9× 18 0.3× 15 339
Ray J Adams Australia 6 70 0.7× 176 1.7× 14 0.2× 79 1.3× 7 0.1× 15 356

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Cline

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Cline's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Cline with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Cline more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Cline

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Cline. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Cline. The network helps show where Frederick Cline may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick Cline

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick Cline. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick Cline based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick Cline. Frederick Cline is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bridgeman, Brent & Frederick Cline. (2022). Can the GRE predict valued outcomes? Dropout and writing skill. PLoS ONE. 17(6). e0268738–e0268738. 3 indexed citations
2.
Klieger, David M., et al.. (2022). Using third-party evaluations to assess socioemotional skills in graduate and professional school admissions. International Journal of Testing. 22(1). 72–99. 1 indexed citations
3.
Wendler, Cathy, et al.. (2019). Examining the Calibration Process for Raters of the "GRE"® General Test. ETS GRE® Board Research Report. GRE®-19-01. Research Report Series. ETS RR-19-09.. ETS Research Report Series. 1 indexed citations
4.
Wendler, Cathy, et al.. (2019). Examining the Calibration Process for Raters of the GRE® General Test. ETS Research Report Series. 2019(1). 1–19. 3 indexed citations
5.
Klieger, David M., et al.. (2014). New Perspectives on the Validity of the "GRE"® General Test for Predicting Graduate School Grades. ETS GRE® Board Research Report. ETS GRE®-14-03. ETS Research Report. RR-14-26.. ETS Research Report Series. 4 indexed citations
6.
Steinberg, Jonathan, Frederick Cline, & Yasuyo Sawaki. (2011). Examining the Factor Structure of a State Standards-Based Science Assessment for Students with Learning Disabilities. Research Report. ETS RR-11-38.. 2 indexed citations
7.
Young, John W., et al.. (2011). High Schools That Work: Program Description, Literature Review, and Research Findings. Research Report. ETS RR-11-33.. 1 indexed citations
8.
Bridgeman, Brent, Nancy Burton, & Frederick Cline. (2008). Understanding What the Numbers Mean: A Straightforward Approach to GRE Predictive Validity. ETS GRE Board Research Report No. 04-03. ETS RR-08-46.. ETS Research Report Series. 3 indexed citations
9.
Cook, Linda L., et al.. (2008). Examining the Impact of Audio Presentation on Tests of Reading Comprehension. Research Report. ETS RR-08-23.. ETS Research Report Series. 3 indexed citations
10.
Bridgeman, Brent, et al.. (2008). Effects of Calculator Availability on GRE Quantitative Questions. ETS GRE Board Research Report No. 03-09. ETS RR-08-31.. ETS Research Report Series. 1 indexed citations
11.
Cook, Linda L., et al.. (2008). EXAMINING THE IMPACT OF AUDIO PRESENTATION ON TESTS OF READING COMPREHENSION. ETS Research Report Series. 2008(1). 16 indexed citations
12.
Bridgeman, Brent, et al.. (2007). Time Requirements for the Different Item Types Proposed for Use in the Revised SAT®. Research Report No. 2007-3. ETS RR-07-35.. 1 indexed citations
13.
Cline, Frederick, et al.. (2006). Observational Timing Study on the SAT Reasoning Test™ for Test-Takers with Learning Disabilities and/or AD/HD. Research Report No. 2006-4. ETS RR-06-23.. 7 indexed citations
14.
Cline, Frederick, et al.. (2006). OBSERVATIONAL TIMING STUDY ON THE SAT REASONING TEST™ FOR TEST-TAKERS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES AND/OR AD/HD. ETS Research Report Series. 2006(2). i–13. 11 indexed citations
15.
Bridgeman, Brent, et al.. (2004). Effect of Extra Time on Verbal and Quantitative GRE Scores. Applied Measurement in Education. 17(1). 25–37. 19 indexed citations
16.
Bridgeman, Brent & Frederick Cline. (2004). Effects of Differentially Time‐Consuming Tests on Computer‐Adaptive Test Scores. Journal of Educational Measurement. 41(2). 137–148. 39 indexed citations
17.
Bridgeman, Brent, et al.. (2003). EFFECT OF EXTRA TIME ON GRE® QUANTITATIVE AND VERBAL SCORES. ETS Research Report Series. 2003(1). 2 indexed citations
18.
Burton, Nancy, et al.. (2002). Minority Student Success: The Role of Teachers in Advanced Placement Program® (AP®) Courses. Research Report No. 2002-8. ETS RR-02-17.. 8 indexed citations
19.
Bridgeman, Brent & Frederick Cline. (2002). Fairness Issues in Computer Adaptive Tests with Strict Time Limits. 1 indexed citations
20.
Myford, Carol M. & Frederick Cline. (2001). Designing assessment instruments to measure the impact of participation in short-term educational programs. Studies In Educational Evaluation. 27(2). 107–131. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026