John W. Young

2.7k total citations
80 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

John W. Young is a scholar working on Education, Management Science and Operations Research and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, John W. Young has authored 80 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Education, 11 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 11 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in John W. Young's work include Higher Education Research Studies (10 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (10 papers) and Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (9 papers). John W. Young is often cited by papers focused on Higher Education Research Studies (10 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (10 papers) and Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (9 papers). John W. Young collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Australia. John W. Young's co-authors include Jennifer L. Kobrin, Lesley Mandel Morrow, Diane H. Tracey, Martin E. Schriefer, John B. Cooney, Warren W. Willingham, Ernest T. Pascarella, John L. Luckner, Elaine Chin and Claudia R. Molins and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Cancer and Clinical Infectious Diseases.

In The Last Decade

John W. Young

77 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John W. Young United States 23 650 424 287 205 199 80 1.8k
Eric Rosenbaum United States 11 388 0.6× 85 0.2× 879 3.1× 505 2.5× 55 0.3× 47 2.6k
Nigel Thomas United Kingdom 21 460 0.7× 252 0.6× 18 0.1× 192 0.9× 153 0.8× 131 2.1k
Kenny Smith United Kingdom 41 86 0.1× 241 0.6× 1.2k 4.2× 115 0.6× 76 0.4× 243 6.4k
Tim Regan United Kingdom 31 49 0.1× 105 0.2× 41 0.1× 132 0.6× 317 1.6× 92 3.1k
John Bauer United States 10 31 0.0× 161 0.4× 82 0.3× 951 4.6× 129 0.6× 14 5.3k
Tom Carey Canada 14 125 0.2× 58 0.1× 144 0.5× 415 2.0× 19 0.1× 53 1.7k
Jill Denner United States 25 646 1.0× 60 0.1× 915 3.2× 278 1.4× 27 0.1× 78 2.6k
Jane Sinclair United Kingdom 21 693 1.1× 87 0.2× 241 0.8× 541 2.6× 21 0.1× 79 2.1k
David J. Harper United Kingdom 29 100 0.2× 135 0.3× 57 0.2× 647 3.2× 58 0.3× 146 3.3k
Michael E. Gorman United States 25 254 0.4× 15 0.0× 188 0.7× 141 0.7× 146 0.7× 107 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Young. The network helps show where John W. Young may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John W. Young

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John W. Young. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John W. Young based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John W. Young. John W. Young is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Young, John W., et al.. (2024). Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Francisella tularensis Isolates in the United States, 2009–2018. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 78(Supplement_1). S4–S6. 3 indexed citations
2.
Replogle, Adam J., Christopher Sexton, John W. Young, et al.. (2021). Isolation of Borrelia miyamotoi and other Borreliae using a modified BSK medium. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 1926–1926. 22 indexed citations
3.
Dietrich, Elizabeth A., Luke C. Kingry, Kiersten J. Kugeler, et al.. (2019). Francisella opportunistica sp. nov., isolated from human blood and cerebrospinal fluid. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY. 70(2). 1145–1151. 9 indexed citations
4.
Young, John W., et al.. (2014). A Design Framework for the ELTeach Program Assessments. Research Report. ETS RR-14-36.. ETS Research Report Series. 2 indexed citations
5.
Young, John W., et al.. (2014). The Validity of Scores from the "GRE"® revised General Test for Forecasting Performance in Business Schools: Phase One. ETS GRE® Board Research Report. ETS GRE®-14-01. ETS Research Report. RR-14-17.. ETS Research Report Series. 4 indexed citations
6.
Young, John W., et al.. (2013). Assessing the Test Information Function and Differential Item Functioning for the "TOEFL Junior"® Standard Test. Research Report. ETS RR-13-17. "TOEFL Junior"® Research Report. TOEFL JR-01.. ETS Research Report Series. 1 indexed citations
7.
Young, John W., et al.. (2012). Advancing the Quality and Equity of Education for Latino Students: A White Paper. Research Report. ETS RR-12-01.. ETS Research Report Series. 2 indexed citations
8.
Molins, Claudia R., Mark J. Delorey, John W. Young, et al.. (2012). Use of Temperature for Standardizing the Progression of Francisella tularensis in Mice. PLoS ONE. 7(9). e45310–e45310. 8 indexed citations
9.
Young, John W., Steven Holtzman, & Jonathan Steinberg. (2011). Score Comparability for Language Minority Students on the Content Assessments Used by Two States. Research Report. ETS RR-11-27..
10.
Young, John W., et al.. (2011). High Schools That Work: Program Description, Literature Review, and Research Findings. Research Report. ETS RR-11-33.. 1 indexed citations
11.
Latzman, Robert D., James A. Naifeh, David Watson, et al.. (2011). Racial Differences in Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression Among Three Cohorts of Students in the Southern United States. Psychiatry. 74(4). 332–348. 27 indexed citations
12.
Young, John W., Deborah Mason, & Bruce Taylor. (2009). Acute inflammatory encephalomyelitis following Campylobacter enteritis associated with high titre antiganglioside GM1 IgG antibodies. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 16(4). 597–598. 4 indexed citations
13.
Young, John W., et al.. (2008). Testing Accommodations for English Language Learners: A Review of State and District Policies. Research Report No. 2008-6. ETS RR-08-48.. 10 indexed citations
14.
Luckner, John L., et al.. (2005). An Examination of the Evidence-Based Literacy Research in Deaf Education. American annals of the deaf. 150(5). 443–456. 132 indexed citations
15.
Young, John W.. (2003). The Past, Present, and Future of the SAT: Implications for College Admissions. College and university. 78(3). 21–24. 2 indexed citations
16.
Young, John W. & Jennifer L. Kobrin. (2001). Differential Validity, Differential Prediction,and College Admission Testing: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis. Cancer. 118(24). 6039–45. 88 indexed citations
17.
Young, John W.. (1995). "Recentering" the SAT Score Scale.. College and university. 70(2). 60–62. 2 indexed citations
18.
Young, John W.. (1994). The New SAT.. College and university. 69(2). 2 indexed citations
19.
Young, John W., et al.. (1992). Analyzing High School Transcripts to Improve Prediction of College Performance.. ˜The œJournal of college admissions. 9 indexed citations
20.
Young, John W.. (1992). A General Linear Model Approach to Adjusting the Cumulative GPA.. 2(1). 31–37. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026