Maja Graso

645 total citations
32 papers, 417 citations indexed

About

Maja Graso is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Maja Graso has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 417 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 10 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 8 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Maja Graso's work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (10 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers). Maja Graso is often cited by papers focused on Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (10 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers). Maja Graso collaborates with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Canada. Maja Graso's co-authors include Tahira M. Probst, Tania Reynolds, Lixin Jiang, Karl Aquino, Jeroen Camps, Lieven Brebels, Cornelius J. König, Armando Estrada, Sarah E. Greer and Steven L. Grover and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychological Science and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Maja Graso

29 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Maja Graso United States 11 133 130 86 85 77 32 417
Zitong Sheng United States 12 130 1.0× 142 1.1× 128 1.5× 81 1.0× 59 0.8× 26 444
Mallory A. McCord United States 9 177 1.3× 196 1.5× 169 2.0× 234 2.8× 87 1.1× 21 627
Jenny Liao Australia 7 77 0.6× 217 1.7× 152 1.8× 26 0.3× 64 0.8× 14 427
Benjamin M. Walsh United States 15 332 2.5× 270 2.1× 146 1.7× 91 1.1× 146 1.9× 31 644
Tara C. Reich United Kingdom 13 519 3.9× 355 2.7× 269 3.1× 86 1.0× 112 1.5× 18 773
Sara Willis United Kingdom 6 89 0.7× 315 2.4× 143 1.7× 79 0.9× 66 0.9× 11 564
Zhongmin Wang Australia 12 120 0.9× 240 1.8× 132 1.5× 35 0.4× 48 0.6× 22 509
Kathleen R. Keeler United States 7 138 1.0× 146 1.1× 154 1.8× 9 0.1× 56 0.7× 13 443
Caleb B. Bragg United States 5 186 1.4× 201 1.5× 154 1.8× 28 0.3× 159 2.1× 6 536
Fabian O. Ugwu Nigeria 14 149 1.1× 347 2.7× 165 1.9× 33 0.4× 103 1.3× 39 601

Countries citing papers authored by Maja Graso

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maja Graso's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maja Graso with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maja Graso more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maja Graso

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maja Graso. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maja Graso. The network helps show where Maja Graso may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maja Graso

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maja Graso. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maja Graso based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maja Graso. Maja Graso is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Clark, Connie J., Nicholas Kerry, Maja Graso, & Philip E. Tetlock. (2025). Morally offensive scientific findings activate cognitive chicanery. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1552(1). 148–164.
2.
Graso, Maja & Tania Reynolds. (2024). A feminine advantage in the domain of harm: a review and path forward. Biology Letters. 20(11). 20240381–20240381. 1 indexed citations
3.
Graso, Maja, Tania Reynolds, & Karl Aquino. (2023). Worth the Risk? Greater Acceptance of Instrumental Harm Befalling Men than Women. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 52(6). 2433–2445. 5 indexed citations
4.
Graso, Maja, et al.. (2023). Blaming the unvaccinated during the COVID-19 pandemic: the roles of political ideology and risk perceptions in the USA. Journal of Medical Ethics. 50(4). 246–252. 9 indexed citations
5.
Clark, Connie J., et al.. (2023). Harm Hypervigilance in Public Reactions to Scientific Evidence. Psychological Science. 34(7). 834–848. 9 indexed citations
6.
Claudy, Marius, Karl Aquino, & Maja Graso. (2022). Artificial Intelligence Can’t Be Charmed: The Effects of Impartiality on Laypeople’s Algorithmic Preferences. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 898027–898027. 17 indexed citations
7.
Graso, Maja, et al.. (2022). The dark side of belief in Covid-19 scientists and scientific evidence. Personality and Individual Differences. 193. 111594–111594. 10 indexed citations
8.
Graso, Maja, Karl Aquino, Lily Lin, et al.. (2022). The vigilante identity and organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 170. 104136–104136. 7 indexed citations
9.
Graso, Maja, et al.. (2022). Scapegoating of the Unvaccinated Individuals and the Role of Political Ideology. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
10.
Graso, Maja. (2022). The new normal: Covid-19 risk perceptions and support for continuing restrictions past vaccinations. PLoS ONE. 17(4). e0266602–e0266602. 6 indexed citations
11.
Bies, Robert J., Karl Aquino, Laurie J. Barclay, et al.. (2022). Effectively Managing Negative Situations to Create a Better World Together. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2022(1). 1 indexed citations
12.
Graso, Maja, et al.. (2020). Moralization of Covid-19 health response: Asymmetry in tolerance for human costs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 93. 104084–104084. 34 indexed citations
13.
Barclay, Laurie J., Thomas M. Tripp, Robert J. Bies, et al.. (2020). The Management of Identity-Based Conflicts: New Directions in Justice Research. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2020(1). 18129–18129. 1 indexed citations
14.
Camps, Jeroen, Maja Graso, & Lieven Brebels. (2019). When Organizational Justice Enactment Is a Zero-Sum Game: A Trade-Offs and Self-Concept Maintenance Perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives. 36(1). 30–49. 7 indexed citations
15.
Eagly, Alice H., et al.. (2019). Beyond Biological Sex: The Importance of the Psychological Study of Gender in Organizations. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2019(1). 11534–11534. 1 indexed citations
16.
Tripp, Thomas M., et al.. (2018). The Fair Process Effect in the Classroom: Reducing the Influence of Grades on Student Evaluations of Teachers. Journal of Marketing Education. 41(3). 173–184. 17 indexed citations
17.
Probst, Tahira M., Lixin Jiang, & Maja Graso. (2015). Leader–member exchange: Moderating the health and safety outcomes of job insecurity. Journal of Safety Research. 56. 47–56. 30 indexed citations
18.
Probst, Tahira M., Maja Graso, Armando Estrada, & Sarah E. Greer. (2013). Consideration of future safety consequences: A new predictor of employee safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 55. 124–134. 33 indexed citations
19.
Probst, Tahira M. & Maja Graso. (2013). Pressure to produce=pressure to reduce accident reporting?. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 59. 580–587. 63 indexed citations
20.
Estrada, Armando, et al.. (2011). Evaluating the Psychometric and Measurement Characteristics of a Measure of Sexual Orientation Harassment. Military Psychology. 23(2). 220–236. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026