Nicholas Kerry

491 total citations
27 papers, 245 citations indexed

About

Nicholas Kerry is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicholas Kerry has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 245 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 14 papers in Social Psychology and 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Nicholas Kerry's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (13 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (11 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (10 papers). Nicholas Kerry is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (13 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (11 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (10 papers). Nicholas Kerry collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Nicholas Kerry's co-authors include Damian R. Murray, Jeremy D. W. Clifton, Will M. Gervais, Jin X. Goh, Claire White, Daniel M. T. Fessler, Marjorie L. Prokosch, Laura M. Perry, Robert C. Brooks and Colin Tucker Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Psychological Science and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Nicholas Kerry

19 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nicholas Kerry United States 10 129 116 111 80 49 27 245
Aaron L. Wichman United States 9 131 1.0× 140 1.2× 57 0.5× 84 1.1× 49 1.0× 19 275
Carey J. Fitzgerald United States 10 124 1.0× 88 0.8× 29 0.3× 144 1.8× 97 2.0× 22 271
Dylan Selterman United States 11 108 0.8× 167 1.4× 95 0.9× 110 1.4× 77 1.6× 18 279
Saori Tsukamoto Japan 8 54 0.4× 140 1.2× 34 0.3× 65 0.8× 54 1.1× 15 218
Maxim Babush United States 5 195 1.5× 126 1.1× 32 0.3× 20 0.3× 38 0.8× 5 278
Juliana E. French United States 9 126 1.0× 131 1.1× 17 0.2× 84 1.1× 68 1.4× 18 252
Justin V. Cavallo Canada 9 102 0.8× 234 2.0× 17 0.2× 79 1.0× 85 1.7× 13 307
Kathryn Iurino United States 4 87 0.7× 98 0.8× 69 0.6× 38 0.5× 57 1.2× 4 213
Kimihiro Shiomura Japan 4 135 1.0× 146 1.3× 43 0.4× 33 0.4× 44 0.9× 7 209
Jessica D. Ayers United States 8 107 0.8× 85 0.7× 34 0.3× 86 1.1× 32 0.7× 23 212

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Kerry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Kerry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Kerry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Kerry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Kerry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Kerry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Kerry. The network helps show where Nicholas Kerry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas Kerry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas Kerry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas Kerry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas Kerry. Nicholas Kerry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kerry, Nicholas, et al.. (2025). World Beliefs Moderate the Effects of Trauma and Severe Illness on Emotional Distress. Journal of Personality.
2.
Kerry, Nicholas, et al.. (2025). World beliefs predict self-reported sustainable behaviors beyond Big Five personality traits and political ideology. PsychOpen Gold (Leibniz Institute for Psychology). 3.
3.
Clark, Connie J., Nicholas Kerry, Maja Graso, & Philip E. Tetlock. (2025). Morally offensive scientific findings activate cognitive chicanery. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1552(1). 148–164.
4.
Wheeler, Ahlborn, et al.. (2025). Capturing Author Self Beliefs in Social Media Language. 1362–1376.
5.
Clifton, Jeremy D. W., et al.. (2024). Primal World Belief Research, for Skeptics. Human Development. 68(4). 171–187. 1 indexed citations
6.
Kerry, Nicholas. (2024). Dangerous world belief and threat appraisals. Open Science Framework.
7.
Lansford, Jennifer E., Nicholas Kerry, Suha M. Al‐Hassan, et al.. (2023). Development of Primal World Beliefs. Human Development. 68(4). 149–158.
8.
Kerry, Nicholas, et al.. (2023). Being Thankful for What You Have: A Systematic Review of Evidence for the Effect of Gratitude on Life Satisfaction. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. Volume 16. 4799–4816. 7 indexed citations
10.
Prokosch, Marjorie L., Colin Tucker Smith, Nicholas Kerry, & Jason von Meding. (2022). Too strong to care? Investigating the links between formidability, worldviews, and views on climate and disaster. Politics and the Life Sciences. 41(2). 200–231. 3 indexed citations
11.
Clifton, Jeremy D. W. & Nicholas Kerry. (2022). Belief in a Dangerous World Does Not Explain Substantial Variance in Political Attitudes, But Other World Beliefs Do. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 14(5). 515–525. 15 indexed citations
12.
Goh, Jin X., et al.. (2021). Outbreaks and Outgroups: Three Tests of the Relationship Between Disease Avoidance Motives and Xenophobia During an Emerging Pandemic. Evolutionary Psychological Science. 7(4). 419–429. 28 indexed citations
13.
Kerry, Nicholas, Khandis R. Blake, Damian R. Murray, & Robert C. Brooks. (2021). Male descendant kin promote conservative views on gender issues and conformity to traditional norms. Evolutionary Human Sciences. 3. e34–e34. 5 indexed citations
14.
Kerry, Nicholas, et al.. (2021). Parasites and promiscuity: Acute disease salience leads to more restricted sexual attitudes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 38(11). 3333–3349. 14 indexed citations
15.
Kerry, Nicholas & Damian R. Murray. (2021). Physical Strength Partly Explains Sex Differences in Trait Anxiety in Young Americans. Psychological Science. 32(5). 809–815. 10 indexed citations
16.
Murray, Damian R., et al.. (2020). No evidence for a relationship between MHC heterozygosity and life history strategy in a sample of North American undergraduates. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 10140–10140. 2 indexed citations
17.
Kerry, Nicholas, et al.. (2020). Cultures of Fear: Individual Differences in Perception of Physical (but Not Disease) Threats Predict Cultural Neophobia in both Immigrant and Mainstream Americans. Evolutionary Psychological Science. 6(4). 335–345. 4 indexed citations
18.
Kerry, Nicholas & Damian R. Murray. (2019). Politics and Parental Care: Experimental and Mediational Tests of the Causal Link Between Parenting Motivation and Social Conservatism. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 11(2). 284–292. 20 indexed citations
19.
Murray, Damian R., Nicholas Kerry, & Will M. Gervais. (2017). On Disease and Deontology: Multiple Tests of the Influence of Disease Threat on Moral Vigilance. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 10(1). 44–52. 37 indexed citations
20.
Murray, Damian R., et al.. (2016). The kiss of death: three tests of the relationship between disease threat and ritualized physical contact within traditional cultures. Evolution and Human Behavior. 38(1). 63–70. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026