Kees van den Bos

12.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
183 papers, 7.8k citations indexed

About

Kees van den Bos is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Kees van den Bos has authored 183 papers receiving a total of 7.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 111 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 78 papers in Social Psychology and 60 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Kees van den Bos's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (90 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (57 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (34 papers). Kees van den Bos is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (90 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (57 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (34 papers). Kees van den Bos collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and China. Kees van den Bos's co-authors include E. Allan Lind, Henk Wilke, Riël Vermunt, Joost Miedema, Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Eric van Dijk, Marjolein Maas, Annemarie Loseman, Marcel Zeelenberg and Rik Pieters and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Psychological Science.

In The Last Decade

Kees van den Bos

176 papers receiving 7.3k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management

2002 584 citations Kees van den Bos et al. profile →

Peers

Countries citing papers authored by Kees van den Bos

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kees van den Bos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kees van den Bos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kees van den Bos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kees van den Bos

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kees van den Bos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kees van den Bos. The network helps show where Kees van den Bos may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kees van den Bos

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kees van den Bos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kees van den Bos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kees van den Bos. Kees van den Bos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

#	Work	Indexed citations
1	Protecting the Earth Radically: Perceiving police injustice activates climate protesters’ need for significance 2025 ·Journal of Environmental Psychology ·(unknown), Arie W. Kruglanski, Kees van den Bos, Beatrice de Graaf, (unknown)	0
2	Physical distancing during the COVID‐19 crisis: The roles of threat and moralization 2024 ·Journal of Applied Social Psychology ·(unknown), Marius van Dijke, Kees van den Bos	1
3	How climate protesters perceive injustice and justify breaking the law: Qualitative interviews with Extinction Rebellion 2024 ·SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología ·(unknown), Kees van den Bos, Beatrice de Graaf	7
4	From roadblocks to property damage: How injustice perceptions and trust in authorities are associated with participation in nonnormative climate protest 2024 ·Journal of Applied Social Psychology ·(unknown), Kees van den Bos, Beatrice de Graaf	2
5	Social network site use and materialistic values: the roles of self-control and self-acceptance 2024 ·BMC Psychology ·Qing Yang, (unknown), Kees van den Bos	3
6	Flux Sensor Measurement and Calibration Requirements for High-Intensity Heat Flux Applications 2024 ·SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología ·(unknown), (unknown), (unknown), Kenneth Armijo, (unknown), (unknown), Kees van den Bos	1
7	Procedural fairness in ethnic-cultural decision-making: fostering social cohesion by incorporating minority and majority perspectives 2023 ·Frontiers in Psychology ·Kim Dierckx, Alain Van Hiel, (unknown), Kees van den Bos	2
8	Religious radicalization: social appraisals and finding radical redemption in extreme beliefs 2020 ·Current Opinion in Psychology ·Beatrice de Graaf, Kees van den Bos	23
9	Why People Radicalize 2018 ·Oxford University Press eBooks ·Kees van den Bos	48
10	Commissie sociaal veilige werkomgeving Defensie, eindrapportage: Onderzoek naar een sociaal veilige werkomgeving bij Defensie 2018 ·Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) ·(unknown), (unknown), Kees van den Bos	1
11	Kijken naar het recht 2014 ·Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) ·Kees van den Bos	1
12	The Psychology of Voice and Performance Capabilities in Masculine and Feminine Cultures and Contexts 2010 ·SSRN Electronic Journal ·Kees van den Bos, Joel Brockner, Jordan H. Stein, Dirk D. Steiner, Nico W. Van Yperen, (unknown)	1
13	Waarom jongeren radicaliseren en sympathie krijgen voor terrorisme 2009 ·Kees van den Bos, (unknown), (unknown)	3
14	Does organisational justice protect from sickness absence following a major life event? A Finnish public sector study: Figure 1 2009 ·Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health ·Marko Elovainio, Mika Kivimäki, Anne Linna, Joel Brockner, Kees van den Bos, Jerald Greenberg, Jaana Pentti, Marianna Virtanen, Jussi Vahtera	24
15	The Scope of Social Psychology : Theory and Applications (A Festschrift for Wolfgang Stroebe) 2007 ·Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) ·Miles Hewstone, Henk Schut, John de Wit, Kees van den Bos, Margaret Stroebe	1
16	Uncertainty Management After Reorganizations: The Ameliorative Effect of Outcome Fairness on Job Uncertainty 2006 ·Cairn.info ·Kees van den Bos, Ellen Heuven, (unknown), (unknown)	11
17	Design of a Workstation by a Cognitive Approach. 2001 ·Europe PMC (PubMed Central) ·(unknown), (unknown), (unknown), Kees van den Bos	1
18	Toward understanding why fairness matters: The influence of mortality salience on reactions to procedural fairness. 2000 ·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ·Kees van den Bos, Joost Miedema	22
19	Het lezen van pseudowoorden en bestaande woorden.: Deel 1: De constructie en normering van de Klepel. 1993 ·University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) ·Kees van den Bos, (unknown), (unknown)	2
20	Het lezen van pseudowoorden en bestaande woorden : Deel II: decodeerroutes en decodeerproblemen. 1993 ·University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) ·Kees van den Bos, (unknown)	2

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact