Johannes Bauer

2.3k total citations
78 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Johannes Bauer is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Johannes Bauer has authored 78 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Education, 20 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 18 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Johannes Bauer's work include Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (15 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (11 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (10 papers). Johannes Bauer is often cited by papers focused on Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (15 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (11 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (10 papers). Johannes Bauer collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. Johannes Bauer's co-authors include Hans Gruber, Manfred Prenzel, Regina H. Mulder, Martin Gartmeier, Christian Harteis, Helmut Heid, Eva Thomm, Thomas Rudolph, Eric Fontain and Ivar Ugi and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Angewandte Chemie International Edition and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Johannes Bauer

71 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Johannes Bauer Germany 21 501 262 211 183 174 78 1.2k
Adeyinka Tella Nigeria 19 451 0.9× 122 0.5× 218 1.0× 179 1.0× 119 0.7× 128 1.6k
Sylvia G. Roch United States 17 378 0.8× 67 0.3× 358 1.7× 436 2.4× 295 1.7× 35 1.5k
Marc Rosenberg United States 8 809 1.6× 220 0.8× 150 0.7× 110 0.6× 50 0.3× 24 1.5k
Robert Pryor Australia 24 724 1.4× 93 0.4× 219 1.0× 358 2.0× 472 2.7× 77 1.7k
Elizabeth G. Creamer United States 20 570 1.1× 101 0.4× 238 1.1× 56 0.3× 139 0.8× 97 1.3k
Kathleen M. Galotti United States 21 449 0.9× 376 1.4× 211 1.0× 55 0.3× 312 1.8× 49 1.6k
Marc D. Miller United States 6 248 0.5× 67 0.3× 323 1.5× 126 0.7× 94 0.5× 11 1.0k
George C. Thornton United States 25 303 0.6× 196 0.7× 503 2.4× 882 4.8× 654 3.8× 83 2.5k
Marieke Thurlings Netherlands 10 579 1.2× 163 0.6× 108 0.5× 87 0.5× 99 0.6× 22 904
Mary Ann Hanson United States 13 413 0.8× 92 0.4× 131 0.6× 329 1.8× 339 1.9× 26 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Johannes Bauer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johannes Bauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johannes Bauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johannes Bauer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johannes Bauer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johannes Bauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johannes Bauer. The network helps show where Johannes Bauer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Johannes Bauer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Johannes Bauer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Johannes Bauer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Johannes Bauer. Johannes Bauer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Thomm, Eva, et al.. (2024). Do Reading Goals Make a Difference for Refutation Text Effectiveness?. The Journal of Experimental Education. 94(2). 217–235.
4.
Gold, Bernadette, Eva Thomm, & Johannes Bauer. (2023). Using the theory of planned behaviour to predict pre‐service teachers' preferences for scientific sources. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 94(1). 216–230. 5 indexed citations
5.
Rausch, Andreas, Johannes Bauer, & Michael Gräf. (2022). Research on Individual Learning from Errors in the Workplace – A Literature Review and Citation Analysis. MADOC (University of Mannheim). 47–75.
6.
Thomm, Eva, et al.. (2021). A video-based situational judgement test of medical students’ communication competence in patient encounters: Development and first evaluation. Patient Education and Counseling. 105(5). 1283–1289. 7 indexed citations
7.
Gartmeier, Martin, et al.. (2017). “Who’s afraid of talking to parents?” Professionalism in parent-teacher conversations. 9(3). 5–11. 3 indexed citations
8.
Kiessling, Claudia, Johannes Bauer, Martin Gartmeier, et al.. (2016). Development and validation of a computer-based situational judgement test to assess medical students’ communication skills in the field of shared decision making. Patient Education and Counseling. 99(11). 1858–1864. 15 indexed citations
9.
Seidel, Tina, Kristina Reiss, Johannes Bauer, et al.. (2016). Kompetenzorientierte und evidenzbasierte Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung: Didaktische Weiterentwicklungen im Projekt Teach@TUM. BzL - Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung. 34(2). 230–242. 1 indexed citations
10.
Prenzel, Manfred, Johannes Bauer, & Alexander Renkl. (2015). Evidenzbasierte Praxis - im Lehrerberuf?! Einführung in den Thementeil. Unterrichtswissenschaft. 10 indexed citations
11.
Prenzel, Manfred, et al.. (2015). Kompetenz angehender Lehrkräfte zum Argumentieren mit Evidenz: Erhöht ein Training von Heuristiken die Argumentationsqualität?. Unterrichtswissenschaft. 43(3). 209–224. 16 indexed citations
12.
Gartmeier, Martin, et al.. (2014). Entwicklung von Lehrfilmen zur Gesprächsführung zwischen Realitätsnähe und systematischer didaktischer Gestaltung. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(3). 1 indexed citations
13.
Bauer, Johannes & Christian Harteis. (2012). Human fallibility : the ambiguity of errors for work and learning. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)). 28 indexed citations
14.
Bauer, Johannes, et al.. (2012). What Constitutes a 'Good Assortment'? A Scale for Measuring Consumers' Perceptions of an Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations
15.
Bauer, Johannes & Regina H. Mulder. (2011). Engagement in learning after errors at work: enabling conditions and types of engagement. Journal of Education and Work. 26(1). 99–119. 28 indexed citations
16.
Gruber, Hans, et al.. (2006). The two-fold role of epistemological beliefs in higher education: A review of research about innovation in universities. University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg). 1 indexed citations
17.
Lemmen, Peter, Eric Fontain, & Johannes Bauer. (2005). Ivar K. Ugi (1930–2005): Mehrkomponentenreaktionen, Computer‐ und Phosphorchemie. Angewandte Chemie. 118(2). 199–199. 1 indexed citations
18.
Harteis, Christian, Johannes Bauer, Dagmar Festner, & Hans Gruber. (2004). Self-determination in daily working life. University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg). 4 indexed citations
19.
UGI, I., et al.. (1992). ChemInform Abstract: Computer‐Supported Chemical Calculating, Thinking, and Inventing. ChemInform. 23(38). 1 indexed citations
20.
Bauer, Johannes & Wolfgang Schubert. (1983). Computer modeling of molecular structures. Computers & Chemistry. 7(2). 61–65. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026