Eva Thomm

790 total citations · 1 hit paper
26 papers, 545 citations indexed

About

Eva Thomm is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Eva Thomm has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 545 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 15 papers in Education and 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Eva Thomm's work include Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (21 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (13 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (8 papers). Eva Thomm is often cited by papers focused on Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (21 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (13 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (8 papers). Eva Thomm collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Israel and Netherlands. Eva Thomm's co-authors include Rainer Bromme, Johannes Bauer, Sarit Barzilai, Niels G. Mede, Veronika Wolf, Bernadette Gold, Manfred Prenzel, Christine Sälzer, Tilmann Betsch and Stephanie Pieschl and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Cognitive Science.

In The Last Decade

Eva Thomm

23 papers receiving 510 citations

Hit Papers

An anchor in troubled times: Trust in science before and ... 2022 2026 2023 2024 2022 25 50 75
What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

  1. An anchor in troubled times: Trust in science before and within the COVID-19 pandemic
    2022 84 citations Rainer Bromme, Niels G. Mede et al. PLoS ONE profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eva Thomm Germany 12 289 271 265 50 38 26 545
Friederike Hendriks Germany 11 120 0.4× 334 1.2× 108 0.4× 92 1.8× 19 0.5× 20 511
Галина Солдатова Russia 13 118 0.4× 261 1.0× 162 0.6× 54 1.1× 9 0.2× 58 462
Amanda Crowell United States 10 503 1.7× 90 0.3× 570 2.2× 21 0.4× 10 0.3× 12 807
Joan L. Whipp United States 10 191 0.7× 148 0.5× 488 1.8× 35 0.7× 17 0.4× 17 603
Patricia Donahue Canada 12 385 1.3× 77 0.3× 526 2.0× 10 0.2× 27 0.7× 23 740
Matthias Kleimann Germany 8 38 0.1× 506 1.9× 330 1.2× 69 1.4× 17 0.4× 17 603
Erin McCloskey United States 7 142 0.5× 71 0.3× 386 1.5× 22 0.4× 14 0.4× 17 615
Xinchen Fu China 12 44 0.2× 157 0.6× 185 0.7× 29 0.6× 17 0.4× 18 421
Julianne Moss Australia 15 76 0.3× 166 0.6× 428 1.6× 16 0.3× 11 0.3× 79 608
Jennifer Cunha Portugal 17 128 0.4× 121 0.4× 530 2.0× 8 0.2× 15 0.4× 32 695

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Thomm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Thomm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Thomm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Thomm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Thomm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Thomm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Thomm. The network helps show where Eva Thomm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eva Thomm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eva Thomm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eva Thomm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eva Thomm. Eva Thomm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Scharrer, Lisa, Eva Thomm, Marc Stadtler, & Rainer Bromme. (2025). What Makes Sources Credible? How Source Features Shape Evaluation of Scientific Information. The Journal of Experimental Education. 1–24. 1 indexed citations
2.
Thomm, Eva, et al.. (2024). Do Reading Goals Make a Difference for Refutation Text Effectiveness?. The Journal of Experimental Education. 94(2). 217–235.
3.
4.
Thomm, Eva, et al.. (2024). Fostering student teachers’ research-based knowledge of effective feedback. European Journal of Teacher Education. 47(2). 389–407. 5 indexed citations
5.
Gold, Bernadette, Eva Thomm, & Johannes Bauer. (2023). Using the theory of planned behaviour to predict pre‐service teachers' preferences for scientific sources. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 94(1). 216–230. 5 indexed citations
6.
Bromme, Rainer, et al.. (2022). An anchor in troubled times: Trust in science before and within the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE. 17(2). e0262823–e0262823. 84 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
8.
Thomm, Eva, et al.. (2021). A video-based situational judgement test of medical students’ communication competence in patient encounters: Development and first evaluation. Patient Education and Counseling. 105(5). 1283–1289. 7 indexed citations
9.
Thomm, Eva, et al.. (2021). On predictors of misconceptions about educational topics: A case of topic specificity. PLoS ONE. 16(12). e0259878–e0259878. 7 indexed citations
10.
Thomm, Eva, Bernadette Gold, Tilmann Betsch, & Johannes Bauer. (2021). When preservice teachers’ prior beliefs contradict evidence from educational research. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 91(3). 1055–1072. 31 indexed citations
11.
Pieschl, Stephanie, et al.. (2021). Effects of Raising Student Teachers’ Metacognitive Awareness of Their Educational Psychological Misconceptions. Psychology Learning & Teaching. 20(2). 214–235. 12 indexed citations
12.
Kammerer, Yvonne, et al.. (2020). How laypersons consider differences in sources’ trustworthiness and expertise in their regulation and resolution of scientific conflicts. International Journal of Science Education Part B. 10(4). 335–354. 6 indexed citations
13.
Thomm, Eva, Andreas Dinkel, A. Fleischmann, et al.. (2020). How can communicative competence instruction in medical studies be improved through digitalization?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 37(6). Doc57–Doc57. 7 indexed citations
14.
15.
Thomm, Eva, Sarit Barzilai, & Rainer Bromme. (2017). Why do experts disagree? The role of conflict topics and epistemic perspectives in conflict explanations. Learning and Instruction. 52. 15–26. 24 indexed citations
16.
17.
Bromme, Rainer, et al.. (2016). Who knows? Explaining Impacts on the Assessment of our own Knowledge and of the Knowledge of Experts. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie. 30(2-3). 97–108. 6 indexed citations
18.
Bromme, Rainer & Eva Thomm. (2015). Knowing Who Knows: Laypersons' Capabilities to Judge Experts' Pertinence for Science Topics. Cognitive Science. 40(1). 241–252. 43 indexed citations
19.
Thomm, Eva, et al.. (2014). The Explaining Conflicting Scientific Claims (ECSC) Questionnaire: Measuring Laypersons’ explanations for conflicts in science. Learning and Individual Differences. 37. 139–152. 25 indexed citations
20.
Thomm, Eva & Rainer Bromme. (2011). “It should at least seem scientific!” Textual features of “scientificness” and their impact on lay assessments of online information. Science Education. 96(2). 187–211. 76 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Friederike Hendriks Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Галина Солдатова Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Amanda Crowell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joan L. Whipp Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Patricia Donahue Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Matthias Kleimann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Erin McCloskey Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Xinchen Fu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Julianne Moss Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer Cunha
Rankless by CCL
2026