Gregory M. Hurtz

15 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Hit Papers

Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited.200020262008201720002505007501000

Peers

Gregory M. Hurtz
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Clinical Psychology 702
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 697
  • Social Psychology 664
  • Sociology and Political Science 347
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 243
Replace Martin Kleinmann with:
Martin Kleinmann Switzerland
Ryan Klinger United States
Deborah L. Whetzel United States
John W. Fleenor United States
Sarah A. Hezlett United States
George C. Thornton United States
Leaetta M. Hough United States
Winny Shen Canada
Phillip W. Braddy United States
Steven E. Scullen United States
Gregory M. Hurtz relative to Martin Kleinmann Switzerland Martin Kleinmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Martin Kleinmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gregory M. Hurtz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gregory M. Hurtz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gregory M. Hurtz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gregory M. Hurtz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gregory M. Hurtz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gregory M. Hurtz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gregory M. Hurtz. The network helps show where Gregory M. Hurtz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gregory M. Hurtz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gregory M. Hurtz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gregory M. Hurtz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gregory M. Hurtz. Gregory M. Hurtz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2
A Comparative Study of Online Remote Proctored Versus Onsite Proctored High-stakes Exams
41
3 6
4 9
5 12
6
Big Five Validity and Publication Bias: Conscientiousness Worse than Assumed
2
7 151
8 8
9 13
10 6
11 60
12 135
13 14
14
Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited.breakdown →
1166
15 114
16 41

About Gregory M. Hurtz

Gregory M. Hurtz is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Family Practice and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (5 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (3 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (697 citations), Applied Psychology (180 citations) and Clinical Psychology (702 citations). Gregory M. Hurtz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John J. Donovan, Kevin J. Williams, Stephen A. Dwight, George M. Alliger, Lawrence S. Meyers, Daniel Kuang, Mary Ann Maguire, Michael A. McDaniel, Sven Kepes and George C. Banks. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Educational and Psychological Measurement and Organizational Research Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026