Federico Aime

2.6k citations
27 papers · 1.9k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Federico Aime

25 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance 2014 · 710 citations
7102014202620182022200400600

Peers

Federico Aime
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Strategy and Management 869
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 540
  • Accounting 570
  • Marketing 293
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 180
Replace Michael J. Mannor with:
Michael J. Mannor United States
Samuel Y. Todd United States
Clint Chadwick United States
Arijit Chatterjee France
John R. Deckop United States
Prithviraj Chattopadhyay Hong Kong
Amy Y. Ou United States
Greg Reilly United States
Jake G. Messersmith United States
Timothy M. Gardner United States
Federico Aime relative to Michael J. Mannor United States Michael J. Mannor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Michael J. Mannor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Federico Aime

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Federico Aime's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Federico Aime with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federico Aime more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Federico Aime

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Federico Aime. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Federico Aime. The network helps show where Federico Aime may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Federico Aime, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Federico Aime Line = papers co-authored together Federico Aime links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20230
3 202216
4 202210
5 20215
6 202012
7 202013
8 20182
9 20171
10 201759
11 2014105
12 201445
13 2014135
14 2013182
15 201393
16 201113
17 201129
18 2009142
19 200937
20 200570

About Federico Aime

Federico Aime is a scholar working on Safety Research, Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management and Gender Studies, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (8 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (5 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (5 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (869 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (540 citations), Accounting (570 citations), Marketing (293 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (180 citations). Federico Aime has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Aaron Hill, Stephen E. Humphrey, Oleg V. Petrenko, Jason W. Ridge, Jason W. Ridge, Jeffrey B. Paul, D. Scott DeRue, Scott G. Johnson, Margaret A. White and Christopher J. Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as Strategic Management Journal, Journal of Applied Psychology, Academy of Management Annals, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and The Leadership Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026