Federico Aime
Impact in
- Strategy and Management top 1%
- Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Innovation and Knowledge Management
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Papers in
-
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies 7
-
- Corporate Finance and Governance 8
- Co-authors
- Aaron HillStephen E. HumphreyOleg V. PetrenkoJason W. RidgeJeffrey B. PaulD. Scott DeRueScott G. JohnsonMargaret A. White
- Journals
- Strategic Management Journal (8 papers)Journal of Applied Psychology (2 papers)Academy of Management Annals (2 papers)Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (1 paper)The Leadership Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Federico Aime
25 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Strategy and Management 869
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 540
- Accounting 570
- Marketing 293
- Management of Technology and Innovation 180
Countries citing papers authored by Federico Aime
This map shows the geographic impact of Federico Aime's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Federico Aime with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federico Aime more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Federico Aime
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Federico Aime. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Federico Aime. The network helps show where Federico Aime may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Federico Aime, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 59 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 105 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 45 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 135 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 182 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 93 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 29 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 142 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 37 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 70 |
About Federico Aime
Federico Aime is a scholar working on Safety Research, Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management and Gender Studies, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (8 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (5 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (5 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (869 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (540 citations), Accounting (570 citations), Marketing (293 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (180 citations). Federico Aime has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Aaron Hill, Stephen E. Humphrey, Oleg V. Petrenko, Jason W. Ridge, Jason W. Ridge, Jeffrey B. Paul, D. Scott DeRue, Scott G. Johnson, Margaret A. White and Christopher J. Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as Strategic Management Journal, Journal of Applied Psychology, Academy of Management Annals, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and The Leadership Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.