Tine Köhler

32 papers receiving 641 citations

Peers

Tine Köhler
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 219
  • Communication 100
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 57
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 55
  • Social Psychology 142
Replace Michael B. Harari with:
Michael B. Harari United States
Charles S. White United States
Julia B. Bear United States
Haley M. Woznyj United States
Daniel J. Svyantek United States
Patrick Tissington United Kingdom
Paul V. Martorana United States
Melissa C. Thomas-Hunt United States
Jinyun Duan China
Margaret E. Brooks United States
Tine Köhler relative to Michael B. Harari United States Michael B. Harari's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Michael B. Harari · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tine Köhler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tine Köhler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tine Köhler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tine Köhler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tine Köhler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tine Köhler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tine Köhler. The network helps show where Tine Köhler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tine Köhler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tine Köhler Line = papers co-authored together Tine Köhler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019144
2 201479
3 202159
4 202041
5 202132
6 201732
7 201229
8 201629
9 201825
10 201723
11 201519
12 201816
13 202315
14 201215
15 201513
16 202311
17 201911
18 202010
19 20189
20 20247

About Tine Köhler

Tine Köhler is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 33 papers that have together received 662 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (10 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (5 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (4 papers), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (4 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (4 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research (3 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (219 citations), Communication (100 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (57 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (55 citations) and Social Psychology (142 citations). Tine Köhler has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include José M. Cortina, Stefan Volk, Anne D. Smith, Markus Pudelko, Vikram Bhakoo, Catherine Durnell Cramton, Ronald S. Landis, Pamela Hinds, Justin A. DeSimone and Anne‐Wil Harzing. Their work appears in journals such as Organizational Research Methods, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Academy of Management Learning and Education, Journal of International Business Studies and The International Journal of Human Resource Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact